Is this a joke?
(twitter.com)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
The “we have 300 witnesses” was a good play by Trump. Either they take the bait, or suddenly move to end the trial and either convict Trump (unlikely and looks shady when they didn’t want more witnesses) or (much more likely) acquit which both of them makes them look suspicious since they did a 180 after Trump implied “we have it all”
They literally agreed to throw out all witnesses and take Beutlers statement... That means even a discussion or introduction to election fraud won’t even see the light of day.
Trump and his team obviously didn't want to talk about election fraud in this forum. His lawyers side stepped the issue yesterday. I trust that there is a reason for this.
Deported.
Okay calm down everyone. I believe Trump had this set up in a win-win situation for him and a lose-lose situation for them.
I think Plan A was to get this over with as quickly as possible because this whole trial means literally nothing. BUT if that didn't happen, they were prepared to call hundreds of witnesses to destroy the Dems which was Plan B. Either way he wins. He either gets what he wants originally OR he gets to wreck the Dems and drag this thing out for months. The choice was theirs, but they lose either way. It's just a matter of HOW they want to lose lol
Exactly!
But then nothing is exposed during the impeachment trial. Nothing about what the Dems have done, nothing about the election fraud. This was supposed to be the moment everyone is red-pilled.
Q never said this is the moment everyone is red-pilled. That was only a theory from Anons.
This is the problem with date fagging. People think they know the plan and place all their hopes onto certain dates or events. Then, when the big reveal doesn't happen on said date, everyone dooms.
I am off that cycle. I pay attention to dates and have fun making theories and wondering what COULD happen, but I no longer place all my hopes and dreams on certain dates. Not worth it.
I love this comment and wish I could give it a thousand upvotes,
Apparently not. Seems like a deal was possibly made here. Or, at the very least, Trump now fully knows he's not gonna win playing by [their] rules and is now probably setting plans in motion for a SCOTUS review and action, or maybe military intervention finally.
No other options seem logical to me at this point.
Also, watch for [them] to try to amend the 2/3 majority conviction rule down to a simple majority in order to get a conviction. Since we all know [they] ONLY play by [their] rules, and love to change the rules as [they] go and see fit, I expect [them] to at least make an attempt. [They] wouldn't be good little DS asshats if [they] didn't try.
After all, Q did say, "The military is THE ONLY WAY."
I think you are underestimating Trump and the plan. They set this up to make the Dems look bad either way.
I'm sorry you believe that. It is your right, but it must suck to have no hope.
I choose to look at all the things happening around the world and connect the dots, which convinces me that there IS a plan in operation.
Have I made alternate SHTF preps? Of course. Plain foolish not to. Am I brainwashed and ignoring the possibility that there is no plan? No. I am simply choosing to evaluate what I see and remain optimistic as long as what I am seeing supports that possibility.
You might be right, you might be wrong my sense is there must be more to this story, what more there is I have no idea currently.
It’s all theater. Some people like horror movies some people like drama ! They’re trying to appeal to everyone. The Dems keep their base the Republicans keep their base ...its all a game And the losers ....we the people !
I’m sure the plan has taken many moves and turns and my prayer is that the Real patriots in this game find the path back to main street And we the people win in the end.
Why accept her statement? Why not call Kevin McCarthy to testify? I can't find reliable information that his statement was even made. It doesn't mean he didn't say it, but if he did, why won't they call him and let him testify to it? That makes me think the "reportedly" is exactly what all "reported" stories are: a sham.
Someone PLEASE explain to me how we can work this to our benefit? Why would Van Der Veen ever agree to this? What happened to the 300 witnesses?!?
Ugh! This is awful!!!
This stupid clown show is so hard to follow.... they voted to allow witnesses, and then go on recess for an hour, and then come back and just go into closing arguments without saying anything?? Are you kidding me?
What happened to the 301 witnesses?????
My guess is the white hats want this wrapped up quickly, acquittal seems eminent.
This guy has a good take on it.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EfTJXONXmy8T/
THIS! What. The. F**K!?
So when do the defamation charges start up?
Oh no! I hope not!!!
crazy show
The problem is it takes 51 votes to approve or allow any particular witness from what i have read. If this is true then not Republican witnesses would be allowed
Do they want a conviction? Pull out all of the traitors?
do we know what his statement is?
She basically is a RINO that claims Trump incited and tried to prevent reinforcements from coming to the Capital.
Really. It smells like betrayal to me.