900k is way too many unless they've been doing this for year which is obviously possible. I think it's more likely that it's poorly worded and that the voter dumps added up to 300k.
2012 General Election had 3,854,489 votes | 2016 General Election had 3,984,631 votes | 2020 General Election had 4,460,524 votes
I skimmed that and now believe it is way more than 300k, but it would still not be three huge dumps of 300k+ which should be very noticeable on the graph. That also mentions almost 800k votes lost so perhaps people are defining the fraud differently.
Three x 300k as in 900,000 votes? Am I reading that right?
Thats how I read it, but I could be wrong.
900k is way too many unless they've been doing this for year which is obviously possible. I think it's more likely that it's poorly worded and that the voter dumps added up to 300k.
2012 General Election had 3,854,489 votes | 2016 General Election had 3,984,631 votes | 2020 General Election had 4,460,524 votes
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/its_in_the_code_hankypanky_in_virginias_votes.html
I skimmed that and now believe it is way more than 300k, but it would still not be three huge dumps of 300k+ which should be very noticeable on the graph. That also mentions almost 800k votes lost so perhaps people are defining the fraud differently.
Unfortunately, yes!