23
posted ago by redtoe-skipper ago by redtoe-skipper +25 / -2

Quite questionable post since the voting was 57-43 and not 53-47, so, I amended the post to reflect that.

It leaves the question at the end just as valid.

A couple of days ago I posted my expectation that the acquittal in the Peach Mint 2.0 would come down to 53-47. (https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRH0uuCH/x/c/4Dx4LXmhPGj) As evidenced by this article, https://nypost.com/2021/02/13/senate-votes-to-acquit-donald-trump-in-impeachment-trial/ , it was 53 - 47 (should have been 57 - 43). The basis for this expectation can be found in Q posts. goto qagg.news and plug in the following search string without the quotation marks: "53 - 47". Here is the list: https://qagg.news/?q=53-47 Post 3533 says this:

Reminder re: impeachment. 2/3rd Senate vote required to impeach POTUS. 53-47 Logical thinking. You are watching D's 'con' liberal base using 'hope' tactics while maintaining 'POTUS obstruction of Justice' FAKE NEWS narrative. Think 2020. Q

Think 2020. In hindsight, this ties indeed the election of 2020 to a new impeachment under the header: multiple meanings exist. In other posts, Q indicates that the clock is ticking and poses the unanswered question: When will the "1st" alarm go off? I guess, the second alarm has gone off. Who is still deeply snoozed in lala-land?