Quite questionable post since the voting was 57-43 and not 53-47, so, I amended the post to reflect that.
It leaves the question at the end just as valid.
A couple of days ago I posted my expectation that the acquittal in the Peach Mint 2.0 would come down to 53-47. (https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRH0uuCH/x/c/4Dx4LXmhPGj) As evidenced by this article, https://nypost.com/2021/02/13/senate-votes-to-acquit-donald-trump-in-impeachment-trial/ , it was 53 - 47 (should have been 57 - 43). The basis for this expectation can be found in Q posts. goto qagg.news and plug in the following search string without the quotation marks: "53 - 47". Here is the list: https://qagg.news/?q=53-47 Post 3533 says this:
Reminder re: impeachment. 2/3rd Senate vote required to impeach POTUS. 53-47 Logical thinking. You are watching D's 'con' liberal base using 'hope' tactics while maintaining 'POTUS obstruction of Justice' FAKE NEWS narrative. Think 2020. Q
Think 2020. In hindsight, this ties indeed the election of 2020 to a new impeachment under the header: multiple meanings exist. In other posts, Q indicates that the clock is ticking and poses the unanswered question: When will the "1st" alarm go off? I guess, the second alarm has gone off. Who is still deeply snoozed in lala-land?
Shouldn't you address the fact it wasn't 53 - 47 but 57 - 43?
Yes. I totally ff'ed up.
Must have been the overdose on popcorn and whiskey. ;-)
So I suggest (if you're not hoping to score points on fake proof) you add a big EDIT at the beginning of the post so the next people won't waste time.
It's ok to make mistake.
It's not ok to keep fake news up if it's based on false information because:
it can be used be FAKE NEWS against GA movement
it can discourage new commers to research here.
Auch ..... have you checked my account?
I think your suggestion to alter the contrib is correct.