How about passing a law that our dna is our property. (Obvious) Thereby any use of it must be compensated at the rate each individual sets. And of course, we don’t have to sell. -Any case law on this already? - The Great Awakening

186

How about passing a law that our dna is our property. (Obvious) Thereby any use of it must be compensated at the rate each individual sets. And of course, we don’t have to sell. -Any case law on this already?

posted 4 years ago by Andtheworldwillknow 4 years ago by Andtheworldwillknow +186 / -0

Time to stop giving ourselves away.

25 comments

25 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (25)

sorted by:

▲ 0 ▼

– OckhamsBuzzsaw 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

I don't think rights fundamentally "come from" courts OR constitutions, but we're not talking about natural rights or moral rights. You made a claim about the Fifth Amendment, which is a legal claim. Since the Fifth Amendment does not literally say "no person's DNA shall be involuntarily analyzed," we have to resort to interpretation. Maybe your interpretation is better than the one SCOTUS arrived at, but theirs is the one that determines what "the Fifth Amendment protects" in practice.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– CovfefeNegro 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Go argue with that other fella or fellette, I'm not interested.

https://files.catbox.moe/ko4dc5.jpg

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -1 ▼

– OckhamsBuzzsaw -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

Not arguing; just stating facts.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -2 ▼

– deleted -2 points 4 years ago +1 / -3

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q