In order to prove we are not a cult, we need to show that we can consider opposite views to ours. I distrust echo chambers, that's why I'm looking for debunks of Q but so far, I haven't found anything substantial.
The "news" has been doing the "citing other news shows" for decades now! And wikipedia has been garbage forever and on its home page it clearly states that the site is not a proper source for research. Proper research is simple when it only tracking cited sources back to the original source, but what people call "media" is how the perceive news now as a "narrative" telling them a story.
Yes, I was pretty disappointed. I was looking for an in-depth debunk, but none of the debunkers are doing their homework.
It's rare but some " debunkers " actually do their homework. We call them followers now.
In order to prove we are not a cult, we need to show that we can consider opposite views to ours. I distrust echo chambers, that's why I'm looking for debunks of Q but so far, I haven't found anything substantial.
The "news" has been doing the "citing other news shows" for decades now! And wikipedia has been garbage forever and on its home page it clearly states that the site is not a proper source for research. Proper research is simple when it only tracking cited sources back to the original source, but what people call "media" is how the perceive news now as a "narrative" telling them a story.