Please read my comments above. We have the right to refuse under legal informed consent. US and International Law states that any person has the right to refuse to participate in medical experimentation. These "vaccines" are only FDA approved under the Emergency Authorization Act. They are experimental because the studies are still under way - the claim cannot be made that they are either safe or effective. Any claims to either are only preliminary.

The general public has been commandeered to participate in this huge medical experiment and they are counting on our ignorance. Any person given this "vaccine" must sign informed consent. The problem is that the benefits and risks cannot be advised in order to truly give informed consent because that is still being determined. This is the area we need to challenge because they cannot make any claims as to the safety or efficacy of the "vaccine" they want to give you - it is still being evaluated and is therefore an experiment. We have the legal right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment. A person cannot be coerced under threat of unemployment, or any other means of coercion, to participate in medical experimentation. Until the FDA changes the classification, this is the backbone of our argument and the basis for lawsuits. Hopefully, if this legal argument can gain some momentum, employers will be forced to back down or run the risk of lawsuits. They are not going to be able to wrangle out of this one because of decades of legal precedent in this area.