Okay, thanks, I am happy to proceed on the truth of Yahweh, in love.
Yes, my statement is a quick overgeneralization meant to assist in unity. More accurately, the forum policy is "follow the law"; "they want you labeled by race" with "they" meaning "the true target"; and "no racism", a reporting rule. To be pedantic (again, meaning to assist), that means the forum is against racism and members that are not are subject to penalty.
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description? The fact that allegations of racism are typically not themselves made color-blindly is so glaringly obvious that it doesn't need these additional distortions to get people to see it. If I'm missing something obvious, I'd like to know!
Don't be so quick to prioritize unity. Discernment first.
2 Corinthians 6:14
Do not be unequally bound together with unbelievers [do not make mismatched alliances with them, inconsistent with your faith]. For what partnership can righteousness have with lawlessness? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description?...If I'm missing something obvious
I found your initial comment sufficiently objectionable that I resist reading it in full now to confirm that you made an argument about the question you raise directly above. What you may be missing is that from the start you swept aside the subject of white genocide, thus demonstrating a lack of identification or sympathy with it, thus causing people to suspect you were in league with the people perpetrating it.
Oh, I see. Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide; that's partly because I don't see God's plan permitting significant destruction of any major God-fearing race at this time in history.
However, being new to Q, what I've seen is that the child sacrifice is not excessively racially based; kids of all races are being trafficked. So there's another reason I didn't equate it with "white genocide". Further, we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
Genocide bad. Racism bad. Racism disguised as anti-racism bad.
So then, what I can affirm is that I do see accusations of racism and demands for reparations being unduly weighted in favor of and against certain races (and I am not myself charging racism simply by observing this fact about racial disparity). Then I can affirm that underneath this cover of "anti-racism" there is real death and destruction going on and it too may well be racially imbalanced. However, the absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts and we must be very cautious in this minefield to discern what the facts are before making up the memes.
I'd ask for statistics, but there's the overcorrection risk again because I don't think the Q forum should be redirected to overanalyzing the demographics of the destruction, rather than fighting it regardless of demographics. I chose to walk into this post, so I can see it through, but I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong (that is, we are all to be "anti" racism).
Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide;
I'm not aware of it having occured to anyone but you.
we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
I reject your false assertion, or spell (suggestive words meant to be unthinkingly accepted), directed at a people you don't understand. Name calling by the enemy and their weaponized useful idiots is expected, not feared. You identify with the accusers more than with us here. They wouldn't do it unless they thought it worked. You think it works. It stopped working on Trump supporters in 2016. The racism charge died among the general public with BLM fatigue.
I believe every race, people is beloved by God, and
Proverbs 14:34
Righteousness [moral and spiritual integrity and virtuous character] exalts a nation, But sin is a disgrace to any people.
but a coordinated, high-level campaign to breed out and replace a native people is by definition genocide.
At the time of the founding of the United States, there were towns where one could not find an unbeliever, and European countries were also once strongholds of Christianity, but as the people strayed from obeying God's commandments and living according to his instructions, enemies of Jesus have worked to reduce and replace those populations. Just as in the Bible God gave or took away territory depending on whether a people loved Him. Where people were once devout, now indifference and hostility is common. I see Eastern Europe still honoring God and keeping their heritage.
I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong
I hope you recognize that's a different subject than classrooms in Western Europe having few white schoolchildren.
absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts
There is no evidence will be accepted better at Reddit. We're done.
I didn't go further. If you love Yahweh, you love truth. Let's start by speaking the truth. Not everyone is against racism
Okay, thanks, I am happy to proceed on the truth of Yahweh, in love.
Yes, my statement is a quick overgeneralization meant to assist in unity. More accurately, the forum policy is "follow the law"; "they want you labeled by race" with "they" meaning "the true target"; and "no racism", a reporting rule. To be pedantic (again, meaning to assist), that means the forum is against racism and members that are not are subject to penalty.
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description? The fact that allegations of racism are typically not themselves made color-blindly is so glaringly obvious that it doesn't need these additional distortions to get people to see it. If I'm missing something obvious, I'd like to know!
Don't be so quick to prioritize unity. Discernment first.
2 Corinthians 6:14
Do not be unequally bound together with unbelievers [do not make mismatched alliances with them, inconsistent with your faith]. For what partnership can righteousness have with lawlessness? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
I found your initial comment sufficiently objectionable that I resist reading it in full now to confirm that you made an argument about the question you raise directly above. What you may be missing is that from the start you swept aside the subject of white genocide, thus demonstrating a lack of identification or sympathy with it, thus causing people to suspect you were in league with the people perpetrating it.
Oh, I see. Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide; that's partly because I don't see God's plan permitting significant destruction of any major God-fearing race at this time in history.
However, being new to Q, what I've seen is that the child sacrifice is not excessively racially based; kids of all races are being trafficked. So there's another reason I didn't equate it with "white genocide". Further, we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
Genocide bad. Racism bad. Racism disguised as anti-racism bad.
So then, what I can affirm is that I do see accusations of racism and demands for reparations being unduly weighted in favor of and against certain races (and I am not myself charging racism simply by observing this fact about racial disparity). Then I can affirm that underneath this cover of "anti-racism" there is real death and destruction going on and it too may well be racially imbalanced. However, the absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts and we must be very cautious in this minefield to discern what the facts are before making up the memes.
I'd ask for statistics, but there's the overcorrection risk again because I don't think the Q forum should be redirected to overanalyzing the demographics of the destruction, rather than fighting it regardless of demographics. I chose to walk into this post, so I can see it through, but I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong (that is, we are all to be "anti" racism).
I'm not aware of it having occured to anyone but you.
I reject your false assertion, or spell (suggestive words meant to be unthinkingly accepted), directed at a people you don't understand. Name calling by the enemy and their weaponized useful idiots is expected, not feared. You identify with the accusers more than with us here. They wouldn't do it unless they thought it worked. You think it works. It stopped working on Trump supporters in 2016. The racism charge died among the general public with BLM fatigue.
I believe every race, people is beloved by God, and
but a coordinated, high-level campaign to breed out and replace a native people is by definition genocide.
At the time of the founding of the United States, there were towns where one could not find an unbeliever, and European countries were also once strongholds of Christianity, but as the people strayed from obeying God's commandments and living according to his instructions, enemies of Jesus have worked to reduce and replace those populations. Just as in the Bible God gave or took away territory depending on whether a people loved Him. Where people were once devout, now indifference and hostility is common. I see Eastern Europe still honoring God and keeping their heritage.
I hope you recognize that's a different subject than classrooms in Western Europe having few white schoolchildren.
There is no evidence will be accepted better at Reddit. We're done.