Don't be so quick to prioritize unity. Discernment first.
2 Corinthians 6:14
Do not be unequally bound together with unbelievers [do not make mismatched alliances with them, inconsistent with your faith]. For what partnership can righteousness have with lawlessness? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
So am I wrong to object to the idea that "anti-racist" should be redefined as "anti-white", or that "anti-white" is in fact a racist description?...If I'm missing something obvious
I found your initial comment sufficiently objectionable that I resist reading it in full now to confirm that you made an argument about the question you raise directly above. What you may be missing is that from the start you swept aside the subject of white genocide, thus demonstrating a lack of identification or sympathy with it, thus causing people to suspect you were in league with the people perpetrating it.
Oh, I see. Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide; that's partly because I don't see God's plan permitting significant destruction of any major God-fearing race at this time in history.
However, being new to Q, what I've seen is that the child sacrifice is not excessively racially based; kids of all races are being trafficked. So there's another reason I didn't equate it with "white genocide". Further, we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
Genocide bad. Racism bad. Racism disguised as anti-racism bad.
So then, what I can affirm is that I do see accusations of racism and demands for reparations being unduly weighted in favor of and against certain races (and I am not myself charging racism simply by observing this fact about racial disparity). Then I can affirm that underneath this cover of "anti-racism" there is real death and destruction going on and it too may well be racially imbalanced. However, the absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts and we must be very cautious in this minefield to discern what the facts are before making up the memes.
I'd ask for statistics, but there's the overcorrection risk again because I don't think the Q forum should be redirected to overanalyzing the demographics of the destruction, rather than fighting it regardless of demographics. I chose to walk into this post, so I can see it through, but I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong (that is, we are all to be "anti" racism).
Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide;
I'm not aware of it having occured to anyone but you.
we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
I reject your false assertion, or spell (suggestive words meant to be unthinkingly accepted), directed at a people you don't understand. Name calling by the enemy and their weaponized useful idiots is expected, not feared. You identify with the accusers more than with us here. They wouldn't do it unless they thought it worked. You think it works. It stopped working on Trump supporters in 2016. The racism charge died among the general public with BLM fatigue.
I believe every race, people is beloved by God, and
Proverbs 14:34
Righteousness [moral and spiritual integrity and virtuous character] exalts a nation, But sin is a disgrace to any people.
but a coordinated, high-level campaign to breed out and replace a native people is by definition genocide.
At the time of the founding of the United States, there were towns where one could not find an unbeliever, and European countries were also once strongholds of Christianity, but as the people strayed from obeying God's commandments and living according to his instructions, enemies of Jesus have worked to reduce and replace those populations. Just as in the Bible God gave or took away territory depending on whether a people loved Him. Where people were once devout, now indifference and hostility is common. I see Eastern Europe still honoring God and keeping their heritage.
I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong
I hope you recognize that's a different subject than classrooms in Western Europe having few white schoolchildren.
absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts
There is no evidence will be accepted better at Reddit. We're done.
Okay, again forgive my misguesses when I and the people I "don't understand" have difficulty communicating with each other. I guess you mean the human trafficking is a totally different issue than that other one I've seen, the diminution of white percentage in Western Europe and the stated goal to diminish white percentage in America (which I've always considered farcical and which does not seem a Q topic).
I affirm your Scriptures and generally your history, but again in these matters sketchiness is no virtue. I would've thought I could get data on white population of Western Europe easily, but my searches didn't work that well and I got much more generic statements like "Europe is increasingly a region marked by cultural diversity and foreign-born populations" (Pew 2016). You'll note the difference between restraint and absolutism.
If I widen my search to the untrustworthy "The Guardian", I get the much more direct claim (2000) that "72 per cent of the US population is non-hispanic whites; the US Census Bureau predicts they will become a minority between 2055 and 2060". This is more to the point and has often been in the background of news, but that's why our correct response is to build our families and network our faith within this 60-year window, not to complain about "anti-racists". This is a simple matter of God having a better plan than the devil and the result being determined by how well our generation's righteousness exalts us. If we've survived as a melting pot many more years than this "genocide" movement has been attacking us, we should have means to handle immigration as well as we always have (and if Q is right we will use those means).
The Bible often speaks very strongly against intermarriage (e.g. Solomon), but sometimes it gives an undercurrent of acceptance (e.g. Gibeon). The resolution is that intermarriage must be accompanied by full conversion (e.g. Ruth) and not by fiction (e.g. Shechem) or by refusal even to learn the language (e.g. Nehemiah). The mixed multitude is always with us and we are responsible for training them into true belief in God (and I understand whites are quite a minority among the true worldwide believers in God, compared to the Asian churches thriving under persecution). Given all that, if a population deliberately attempts to infiltrate another for the purpose of weakening the other's culture, that is an act of undeclared war. However, I respect the word "genocide" too much to include mere infiltration within it (infiltration is a different war phase than destruction), and I respect the word "anti-racism" too much to include racism within it. I know there are Q posts about race and I'll review them in this light.
Don't be so quick to prioritize unity. Discernment first.
2 Corinthians 6:14
Do not be unequally bound together with unbelievers [do not make mismatched alliances with them, inconsistent with your faith]. For what partnership can righteousness have with lawlessness? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?
I found your initial comment sufficiently objectionable that I resist reading it in full now to confirm that you made an argument about the question you raise directly above. What you may be missing is that from the start you swept aside the subject of white genocide, thus demonstrating a lack of identification or sympathy with it, thus causing people to suspect you were in league with the people perpetrating it.
Oh, I see. Without sarcasm, it honestly never occurred to me that all the satanic child sacrifice we are fighting also qualifies as genocide; that's partly because I don't see God's plan permitting significant destruction of any major God-fearing race at this time in history.
However, being new to Q, what I've seen is that the child sacrifice is not excessively racially based; kids of all races are being trafficked. So there's another reason I didn't equate it with "white genocide". Further, we don't want to overcorrect and get called "white supremacists" either.
Genocide bad. Racism bad. Racism disguised as anti-racism bad.
So then, what I can affirm is that I do see accusations of racism and demands for reparations being unduly weighted in favor of and against certain races (and I am not myself charging racism simply by observing this fact about racial disparity). Then I can affirm that underneath this cover of "anti-racism" there is real death and destruction going on and it too may well be racially imbalanced. However, the absolutism in the OP is not backed by facts and we must be very cautious in this minefield to discern what the facts are before making up the memes.
I'd ask for statistics, but there's the overcorrection risk again because I don't think the Q forum should be redirected to overanalyzing the demographics of the destruction, rather than fighting it regardless of demographics. I chose to walk into this post, so I can see it through, but I hope what you have to say does include the idea that discriminating negatively against groups due to inborn traits is wrong (that is, we are all to be "anti" racism).
I'm not aware of it having occured to anyone but you.
I reject your false assertion, or spell (suggestive words meant to be unthinkingly accepted), directed at a people you don't understand. Name calling by the enemy and their weaponized useful idiots is expected, not feared. You identify with the accusers more than with us here. They wouldn't do it unless they thought it worked. You think it works. It stopped working on Trump supporters in 2016. The racism charge died among the general public with BLM fatigue.
I believe every race, people is beloved by God, and
but a coordinated, high-level campaign to breed out and replace a native people is by definition genocide.
At the time of the founding of the United States, there were towns where one could not find an unbeliever, and European countries were also once strongholds of Christianity, but as the people strayed from obeying God's commandments and living according to his instructions, enemies of Jesus have worked to reduce and replace those populations. Just as in the Bible God gave or took away territory depending on whether a people loved Him. Where people were once devout, now indifference and hostility is common. I see Eastern Europe still honoring God and keeping their heritage.
I hope you recognize that's a different subject than classrooms in Western Europe having few white schoolchildren.
There is no evidence will be accepted better at Reddit. We're done.
Okay, again forgive my misguesses when I and the people I "don't understand" have difficulty communicating with each other. I guess you mean the human trafficking is a totally different issue than that other one I've seen, the diminution of white percentage in Western Europe and the stated goal to diminish white percentage in America (which I've always considered farcical and which does not seem a Q topic).
I affirm your Scriptures and generally your history, but again in these matters sketchiness is no virtue. I would've thought I could get data on white population of Western Europe easily, but my searches didn't work that well and I got much more generic statements like "Europe is increasingly a region marked by cultural diversity and foreign-born populations" (Pew 2016). You'll note the difference between restraint and absolutism.
If I widen my search to the untrustworthy "The Guardian", I get the much more direct claim (2000) that "72 per cent of the US population is non-hispanic whites; the US Census Bureau predicts they will become a minority between 2055 and 2060". This is more to the point and has often been in the background of news, but that's why our correct response is to build our families and network our faith within this 60-year window, not to complain about "anti-racists". This is a simple matter of God having a better plan than the devil and the result being determined by how well our generation's righteousness exalts us. If we've survived as a melting pot many more years than this "genocide" movement has been attacking us, we should have means to handle immigration as well as we always have (and if Q is right we will use those means).
The Bible often speaks very strongly against intermarriage (e.g. Solomon), but sometimes it gives an undercurrent of acceptance (e.g. Gibeon). The resolution is that intermarriage must be accompanied by full conversion (e.g. Ruth) and not by fiction (e.g. Shechem) or by refusal even to learn the language (e.g. Nehemiah). The mixed multitude is always with us and we are responsible for training them into true belief in God (and I understand whites are quite a minority among the true worldwide believers in God, compared to the Asian churches thriving under persecution). Given all that, if a population deliberately attempts to infiltrate another for the purpose of weakening the other's culture, that is an act of undeclared war. However, I respect the word "genocide" too much to include mere infiltration within it (infiltration is a different war phase than destruction), and I respect the word "anti-racism" too much to include racism within it. I know there are Q posts about race and I'll review them in this light.