Why take a vaccine Which is a brand new technology Which is not sufficiently tested for a virus type which has never had a successful vaccine by companies which can't be sued and have a poor record of vaccine safety lobbied for by people who believe that the world is overpopulated for a disease which is hard to diagnose, with faulty tests for a disease which has a low death rate for young and heathy for a disease for which there are known treatments for a disease which many are already immune?
when we know that governments and tech companies are censoring debate.
Also...PCR test used to verify positive cases during the trial used the flawed high cycle that was "corrected" Jan 20th...so data used during vaccine trial is useless because the PCR tests used during that time were flawed...
How is this?
yes, but this also means the vaccine trial should be null and void because the same overly sensitive positive case testing methods were used for the trial.
Yes, I suppose it does! Thanks, I read your post too fast