it is a friday, so the later they release the news that they are not going to hear these cases, the faster it will be memory holed by what ever happens this weekend.
Yeah, per Lin Wood's whistleblower witness 'JohnHeretoHelp' CJ Roberts was involved in setting up other SCOTUSes to be 187'ed (including Sclaia) and Roberts was providing schedules of (conservative) justices to the hit teams. I listened to the whistleblower interview myself and can verify that this was his testimony on Roberts.
So, if what the whistleblower said about Roberts is true, and Roberts is complicit in the 187 of one SCOTUS and conspiring to 187 more of them, why on earth would Roberts have any qualms about keeping a totally illegitimate president in office, defrauding the American public and denying the Constitution?
A lawyer person in the sticky said that we probably won’t know until Monday whether they’ve decided to take the cases or not
Earlier, Lin wood said "if the majority of the Court is not corrupt, a ruling should be issued today in PA case."
NVM. It seems Lin is almost as clueless as us based on his last post.
I really hope we get some kind of answer today
They are holding it so it gets buried in the weekend news cycle.
Nothing yet.. very very quiet
Rumor mill is saying Monday before we know anything possibly.
it is a friday, so the later they release the news that they are not going to hear these cases, the faster it will be memory holed by what ever happens this weekend.
Thinking the same thing refreshing this board...
I haven't heard anything about it all day. No updates or anything Very weird
So they fear liberals...really, they fear the liberals??? No they need to FEAR US!
Decision is Monday
And if this doesn’t happen?
Then it'll be a job for the militia?
Or perhaps nothing will happen..
or perhaps you won't get your checks;)
Yeah, per Lin Wood's whistleblower witness 'JohnHeretoHelp' CJ Roberts was involved in setting up other SCOTUSes to be 187'ed (including Sclaia) and Roberts was providing schedules of (conservative) justices to the hit teams. I listened to the whistleblower interview myself and can verify that this was his testimony on Roberts.
So, if what the whistleblower said about Roberts is true, and Roberts is complicit in the 187 of one SCOTUS and conspiring to 187 more of them, why on earth would Roberts have any qualms about keeping a totally illegitimate president in office, defrauding the American public and denying the Constitution?