If you slam an aluminum tube full of gas and air into a masonry building at 400mph, how much do you expect to find? Try taping a hundred pop-cans to your front bumper, then Thelma and Louise off the Grand Canyon into a concrete slab, and see how much is left. (Hint: not only will the cans be gone, they'll have trouble finding bits of the car.)
9/11 was the biggest psyop project in US history, and they managed to get almost all of you to deny the most obviously true things (like a plane hitting the Pentagon, which hundreds of people saw in broad daylight) while ignoring the stuff never talked about (because they didn't talk about it). A whole generation of you drank the poison, and so were easily discredited.
For the simple reason that smartphones with cameras would not be a ubiquitous item for another seven or eight years. Thus, there is no video of the plane actually hitting the Pentagon. (Consider New York, population millions, and there's only three or four videos of the planes actually hitting the towers, with the second strike occurring when the media was already on the scene.)
The Cabal never had it so good as in the old days.
Regards the Pentagon hit, there were a lot of small bits, and one or two larger cowling pieces, on the lawn.
Before hitting the Pentagon, the low-flying plane's landing-gear creamed several cars on a highway overpass. (This is all stuff you can look up. 9/11 was a psyop, but the actual mechanism are not fake. There's no missiles, there's no thermite, none of that fucking Oprah & Alex Jones bullshit. That crap is there for you to waste endless amounts of time obsessing over instead of paying attention to what was really going on with the "Patriot Act".)
I’ve seen videos of the explosion from what I think is some sort of gate camera that shows the the explosion site. Because of the distance, you can see before and after. No plane in the whole video.
I located a copy of the video (which I remember seeing fifteen years ago) in ten seconds by tossing "security pentagon plane hit video" at a search-engine. Here it is. Cheap-ass surveillance systems procured in the mid-90s were not 60fps 4k. No. They took one low-resolution photo every few seconds -- as can be seen by watching the cop car herky-jerky through the shot before the plane hit. A plane in flight will cover a hundred feet in a few seconds, so it's not surprise that it goes from pristine Pentagon to explosion in a single frame.
The explosion is big, bright red fire & black smoke fireball, as you would expect with an airliner stuffed full of JP-1A aviation kerosene.
Bullshit.
The government confiscated tons and tons of security cam videos of the incident from around the area.
There is no need to hide that footage and only give us the shitty gate cam which is missing frames, unless you are trying to hide something...
The pentagon itself had no cameras? 2001 wasn't the stone ages. Gas stations had cameras. The pentagon didn't?
Also, there was at least one gas station nearby that had its security footage confiscated by government officials. They never showed that footage, except a few frames of it. Never the full video. If a plane hit the pentagon, why not show that video? Just to lure conspiracy theorists into a trap, I guess..?
Also, the pentagon was hit directly in the offices where they were investigating the missing trillions, was it not? I recall that the exact spot of the pentagon that was hit was highly suspicious. It would be extremely difficult if not impossible to land a plane with that much specificity directly on one particular area of the building. Not even "on" the building, but even with the wall. The landing would have been something a stunt people would have to pull off.
I am not an expert on the subject. I know people have different opinions about how it went down. To me, it remains questionable if a plane actually hit the pentagon. I will keep my mind open on this point. I don't think it's settled one way or the other.
If you slam an aluminum tube full of gas and air into a masonry building at 400mph, how much do you expect to find? Try taping a hundred pop-cans to your front bumper, then Thelma and Louise off the Grand Canyon into a concrete slab, and see how much is left. (Hint: not only will the cans be gone, they'll have trouble finding bits of the car.)
Why that reporter didn't see any chunks of plane is obvious.
9/11 was the biggest psyop project in US history, and they managed to get almost all of you to deny the most obviously true things (like a plane hitting the Pentagon, which hundreds of people saw in broad daylight) while ignoring the stuff never talked about (because they didn't talk about it). A whole generation of you drank the poison, and so were easily discredited.
So if it's so obvious that a plane hit the building, why has no video of it ever been released.
For the simple reason that smartphones with cameras would not be a ubiquitous item for another seven or eight years. Thus, there is no video of the plane actually hitting the Pentagon. (Consider New York, population millions, and there's only three or four videos of the planes actually hitting the towers, with the second strike occurring when the media was already on the scene.)
The Cabal never had it so good as in the old days.
Regards the Pentagon hit, there were a lot of small bits, and one or two larger cowling pieces, on the lawn.
Before hitting the Pentagon, the low-flying plane's landing-gear creamed several cars on a highway overpass. (This is all stuff you can look up. 9/11 was a psyop, but the actual mechanism are not fake. There's no missiles, there's no thermite, none of that fucking Oprah & Alex Jones bullshit. That crap is there for you to waste endless amounts of time obsessing over instead of paying attention to what was really going on with the "Patriot Act".)
I’ve seen videos of the explosion from what I think is some sort of gate camera that shows the the explosion site. Because of the distance, you can see before and after. No plane in the whole video.
I located a copy of the video (which I remember seeing fifteen years ago) in ten seconds by tossing "security pentagon plane hit video" at a search-engine. Here it is. Cheap-ass surveillance systems procured in the mid-90s were not 60fps 4k. No. They took one low-resolution photo every few seconds -- as can be seen by watching the cop car herky-jerky through the shot before the plane hit. A plane in flight will cover a hundred feet in a few seconds, so it's not surprise that it goes from pristine Pentagon to explosion in a single frame.
The explosion is big, bright red fire & black smoke fireball, as you would expect with an airliner stuffed full of JP-1A aviation kerosene.
Bullshit. The government confiscated tons and tons of security cam videos of the incident from around the area. There is no need to hide that footage and only give us the shitty gate cam which is missing frames, unless you are trying to hide something...
The pentagon itself had no cameras? 2001 wasn't the stone ages. Gas stations had cameras. The pentagon didn't?
Also, there was at least one gas station nearby that had its security footage confiscated by government officials. They never showed that footage, except a few frames of it. Never the full video. If a plane hit the pentagon, why not show that video? Just to lure conspiracy theorists into a trap, I guess..?
Also, the pentagon was hit directly in the offices where they were investigating the missing trillions, was it not? I recall that the exact spot of the pentagon that was hit was highly suspicious. It would be extremely difficult if not impossible to land a plane with that much specificity directly on one particular area of the building. Not even "on" the building, but even with the wall. The landing would have been something a stunt people would have to pull off.
I am not an expert on the subject. I know people have different opinions about how it went down. To me, it remains questionable if a plane actually hit the pentagon. I will keep my mind open on this point. I don't think it's settled one way or the other.
A missle hit the Pentagon