Everyone has the legal right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment under informed consent laws. According to US and International Law no one can be coerced, threatened, or forced to take part in medical experimentation. This was because of the atrocities of WW2 and the human experimentation that took place.
This jab is under EUA and therefore considered experimental. None of the jabs are FDA approved as with other vaccines or drugs. All the normal procedures for FDA approval for these jabs were bypassed and they were rushed to production. The data for the initial trials has yet to be completely evaluated and that information is unavailable for review. The trials are still ongoing and the public is part of that experiment.
The technology being used with these jabs is completely new. Several of the components have never been tried on human beings before. One of the reasons the animal trials were bypassed for FDA approval was because all the animal trials for these new technologies failed horribly. The animals all died because of immune priming. Which means, it was not the initial exposure that killed the animals. It was when the animals where later introduced to naturally occurring coronaviruses that their immune systems overreacted which caused multiple organ system failure due to cytokine storm. What that means for us is that anyone that receives the jab now and survives it without severe side effects may die later during the normal exposure to coronaviruses and influenza - a normal cold and flu season.
All a person has to do to refuse this experimentation is to ask what exactly the risks are, which have to be given in writing, and then refuse to accept those risks. A person does not need a religious exemption like with other vaccines. Those vaccines are FDA approved and fall under a different classification. These jabs, no matter the maker, are neither proven safe or effective. Any claim that they are safe or effective is not true because all the data is not in. The soonest any of the studies are to be completed is late next year. So, any claims as to the safety or efficacy of these jabs is premature. This is an experiment.
Sadly, I have heard of cases where people were given jabs without proper informed consent. All it will take is a few hungry attorneys to blow this wide open. They do not want the public to know that they have the right to refuse these jabs.
Everyone has the legal right to refuse to participate in a medical experiment under informed consent laws. According to US and International Law no one can be coerced, threatened, or forced to take part in medical experimentation. This was because of the atrocities of WW2 and the human experimentation that took place.
This jab is under EUA and therefore considered experimental. None of the jabs are FDA approved as with other vaccines or drugs. All the normal procedures for FDA approval for these jabs were bypassed and they were rushed to production. The data for the initial trials has yet to be completely evaluated and that information is unavailable for review. The trials are still ongoing and the public is part of that experiment.
The technology being used with these jabs is completely new. Several of the components have never been tried on human beings before. One of the reasons the animal trials were bypassed for FDA approval was because all the animal trials for these new technologies failed horribly. The animals all died because of immune priming. Which means, it was not the initial exposure that killed the animals. It was when the animals where later introduced to naturally occurring coronaviruses that their immune systems overreacted which caused multiple organ system failure due to cytokine storm. What that means for us is that anyone that receives the jab now and survives it without severe side effects may die later during the normal exposure to coronaviruses and influenza - a normal cold and flu season.
All a person has to do to refuse this experimentation is to ask what exactly the risks are, which have to be given in writing, and then refuse to accept those risks. A person does not need a religious exemption like with other vaccines. Those vaccines are FDA approved and fall under a different classification. These jabs, no matter the maker, are neither proven safe or effective. Any claim that they are safe or effective is not true because all the data is not in. The soonest any of the studies are to be completed is late next year. So, any claims as to the safety or efficacy of these jabs is premature. This is an experiment.
Sadly, I have heard of cases where people were given jabs without proper informed consent. All it will take is a few hungry attorneys to blow this wide open. They do not want the public to know that they have the right to refuse these jabs.