First of: by using legislation to amend previous legislation, it cuts back on the use of paper, but it makes a law totally incomprehensible. It leaves too much to mis-take and erroneous substitution.
Second: the 1963 Act does not speak to anything other than making available funds to set up a transition team, and the process of how the designated administrator is to render an account on how these funds are to be treated.
@Graveimage, @Anotheranon and others: I do support your view that there is nothing in the 1964 and in the 2020 transition funds laws to even hint at Trump retaining some kind of authority to direct the Military.
What we do know is that Presidential terms end at a certain time and date. Constitutionally, these times and dates are provided, but amended by law. I do have to read these provisions again to ascertain whether congress has the right to amend these without the proper constitutional processes: either a constitutional convention or sending proposed legislation to the several states legislatures and have them ratify it with a 2/3 majority of those states.
We also know Q wrote (Q953): Trump admin v2?
And we know, Trump still refers to him as President.
Something is up, that much is clear. Piecing it together is the game. But we sure as hell do not need hopium, but logical thinking.
Let's think back about the wall.
Q wrote it, being the issue of the means more than we would think. Maybe we should use items like these to teach ourselves what Q meant with expanding our thinking.
First of: by using legislation to amend previous legislation, it cuts back on the use of paper, but it makes a law totally incomprehensible. It leaves too much to mis-take and erroneous substitution.
Second: the 1963 Act does not speak to anything other than making available funds to set up a transition team, and the process of how the designated administrator is to render an account on how these funds are to be treated.
@Graveimage, @Anotheranon and others: I do support your view that there is nothing in the 1964 and in the 2020 transition funds laws to even hint at Trump retaining some kind of authority to direct the Military.
What we do know is that Presidential terms end at a certain time and date. Constitutionally, these times and dates are provided, but amended by law. I do have to read these provisions again to ascertain whether congress has the right to amend these without the proper constitutional processes: either a constitutional convention or sending proposed legislation to the several states legislatures and have them ratify it with a 2/3 majority of those states.
We also know Q wrote (Q953): Trump admin v2?
And we know, Trump still refers to him as President.
Something is up, that much is clear. Piecing it together is the game. But we sure as hell do not need hopium, but logical thinking.
Let's think back about the wall.
Q wrote it, being the issue of the means more than we would think. Maybe we should use items like these to teach ourselves what Q meant with expanding our thinking.