SCOTUS, unsurprisingly, rejects election lawsuits in Wisconsin and Georgia
(mobile.twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (161)
sorted by:
I suspect this shit has been in tribunal since just before the 20th, probably about the last time Pelosi acted as speaker of the house without a speaker pro tempura.
You cannot try a case in both SCOTUS and tribunal, so they don't really have an option. Hence the "moot" comment last time and the lack of comment this time. They would say something if they wanted to shut us down.
Although allow me give you a wee bit of grief for your (likely the fault of damn autocorrect) reference to the "speaker pro tempura ?." ?
Unless that was your subtle way of suggesting that Nancy and the Democrats are going to get fried! In which case, bravo! ?
You are right. This is improper. There's no way Nancy Pelosi is as useful as a tempura. At least with that one can get a meal.
Definitely tempura>dried out roast beef
Just add water and watch the curtains grow!
Hahaha...thanks for the chuckle!
Thanks for the chuckle! I wish they would serve tempura, I'll take the shrimp! Hee hee! Stupid autocorrect has made me say the wildest things.
Yes. I think that's an astute and reasonable (well, as reasonable as anything can be these days!) description of what's indeed likely taking place, a more specific explanation of the ongoing mechanism that I more vaguely referenced as "the plan" in my attempt below to logically determine just what the bleep is going on.
It checks out - Piglosi looks to be both battered and deep fried...
Mmm, tempura
So good! Shrimp especially.
they would wait until it’s been exhausted civilly before anything, but now that the civil court route is done they sure can now if they wanted
I hope you are correct....