Then like a minute later they deleted it. Have to take my word for it unless someone screen capped it.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (16)
sorted by:
They said they wouldn't name names in response to someone asking which anons were trustworthy to follow. This was part of a discussion of Charlie Ward and other paytriots/shill-anons. He gave a number of excellent criteria to use in evaluating whether someone was legit of not. Specific dates? Changing dates? Claim to have "insider sources"? Use your discernment and trust your gut. The comment about Pompeo and Flynn (Dan was included) was in response to whether or not comms and decodes were a legit thing for us to be doing (specifically, whether they are bothered by us trying to decode THEIR messages). He didn't specifically say we should or shouldn't analyze their timestamps, etc, (though he said earlier today that they might "gently guide us" to look at various things), but he did say that sometimes a post is just a post. He also said that theyTHEY actively watch posts from Dan, Flynn, and Kansas. I took those to be examples of some of the official people they know ARE specifically "authorized" to give us comms that confirm and point specifically to drops and other info. I didn't take that to mean they are the ONLY ones (for example, Don Jr and many others should be on that list), but George is not going to sit there and give us an exhaustive list of everyone. The not naming anyone comment was in regard to anons. Imagine the division and other problems that would be caused if they gave us a comprehensive list of all the anons who are and aren't "good" to follow. Very wise of them to not do that, but he did give us a "grading scale" you might call it, that we can use to judge what we hear.
My ultimate takeaway is that I don't believe GeorgeNews IS the Q team (though they might actually be and are tossing some decoy info to keep us off the trail), but they are another team working very closely with POTUS and with a LOT more inside scoop on what's really going on than what we have. So, not the full picture, but a much bigger piece than ours and authorization to help "bridge the gap" for us while we walk through this part of the crazy movie.