I noticed here in Canada we are getting many doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine(and the media is already claiming they aren't as good as Pfizer or Moderna which tells me they are probably safer). I have done a lot of research on the mRNA vaccines and I really think there is something truly sinister going on with them.
But when it comes to this other ones such as AstraZeneca and Sputnik from Russia, I don't have much experience. Has anyone researched these?
I wouldn't go near any of these with a 10 foot pole but I have friends and family members who refuse to hear logic when it comes to the Covid vaccine, so I am thinking maybe at the very least I can push them in the direction of avoiding the Pfizer and Moderna.
All the information about Covid-19 is disinformation. It's impossible to know the truth about anything about it.
Having said that, there is a substantial amount of evidence that sars-cov-2 is a real virus that has been isolated and it has spread through the world causing sickness. I have done a great deal of (online) research on this topic and I have yet to see one credible piece of evidence that it doesn't exist and a great deal of evidence that it does. I am inclined to believe these statements of non-existence originated as disinformation. For example:
This small list is the tip of the iceberg of what is going on in sars-cov-2 investigations. Any damning evidence about the virus' origins, or machinations, like the vaccine and mask studies and data, are being suppressed. HOWEVER, they all support the idea that sars-cov-2 is a real virus that has been isolated.
If there exists any evidence to support the idea that the virus does not exist or has not been isolated, I invite anyone to provide that. I have no feelings on the truth of this matter whatsoever except that I want to know what that truth is.
Make no mistake, I believe Covid-19 exists. I just don't think they have done their due diligence and isolated the virus as has been the norm for every vaccine up to now.
I think they cut too many corners and likely even filled in blanks with other past SARS viruses to speed things up and to hide just how manufactured it is.
I also believe that just like everything that comes out of China, it broke in less than a year of purchase.
I think Covid-19, because it was manufactured and not naturally made, has petered out because as it has mutated, like all viruses do, it has broken down so much that it is no longer able to match its original potency. The things they grafted onto the typical SARS virus have been left behind in the mutations because it goes against the nature of SARS.
You can sculpt clay into any shape you wish, but when you put it to task it will only work for a short time before it falls apart.
You have expressed your feelings, and that's well and good. I express my feelings all the time too, but you have provided no evidence to support them (not that I expect you to, but stating a fact for context). I have yet to see credible evidence (and I have looked a LOT) that the coronavirus has not been isolated. In fact, I have found a fair bit of credible evidence that it has, some of which is listed above.
Your assessment on what you think has happened to the virus is not supported by the evidence. It also doesn't jive with my years of experience in a related field. I'm not a virologist but I am close enough to one to demand good evidence (that I will fully understand) of outrageous claims that run contrary to my years of experience.
For example, your assessment of its "changing because its too far from the original SARS" is just not how these things work. Nature doesn't care about the original SARS (whatever that even means). I make "not nature" DNA all the time. If I put that into E. coli, or a human cell line for example, it can be perfectly happy indefinitely, in many cases happier than the "natural" variant under harsher circumstances.
People who have not studied biology extensively think there is a difference between nature and lab. While that is not completely untrue, it is not true in the ways people think. The only real difference between the two is how likely one will get a desired result. Both produce good and bad results (sometimes the exact same result), but in a lab, a good result is more likely.
As for SARS specifically, there is evidence (which I would have to look up because I didn't save it) that it was being developed for a long time. I've seen evidence it was first developed somewhere other than Wuhan (a lab in Africa maybe?) and was then moved to the Wuhan lab for further development and because it was a better place to release it.
I should also mention, all of the vaccine technologies (they aren't real vaccines in the traditional sense) have also been in development for a long time. They are all plug and play technologies. All that is required is isolation of an externally presenting viral protein (the "spike protein"). Once you have the DNA for that spike protein, putting that into these template "vaccines" is almost trivial. It probably took them a week after getting the sequence.
These templates are all relatively new tech (a decade or so), and they are tech I really don't like very much. I design similar systems, but I design them to be discriminatory (target specific cell types). These are spray and pray technologies that are designed to illicit a relatively large scale autoimmune response. I can't really think of a worse design tbh.
But my feelings on it are irrelevant because biology is incredibly complicated (beyond our ken) and a response may be very different than expected once it gets into a test organism (a mouse or human e.g.). The thing that is most relevant to all these vaccines is that they haven't been sufficiently tested. WE are the test, and the data is being hidden. I can't really express my disgust of the whole thing.
Its really difficult to have discussions about it however because of all the disinformation and the armchair biologists armed with it.
You seem to know what you're talking about, or at least you're posturing enough to convince me.
Let me ask you ~3 questions. They are more for you rather than me wanting an actual answer, because I know the truth is either hidden from us or there is no answer. If you know as much as you do, you'll do much better than me at finding the truth if it is at all in reach.
-Compare early 2020 Covid-19 symptoms with asthma attacks and anaphylactic shock. How similar were they, really? Would an over-stimulated immune system open someone up to infection?
-Why do the mRNA "vaccines" cause anaphylactic shock? Have any other vaccines in history done this?
-If Covid-19 has HIV signatures in it, would it necessarily be included to increase its transmissibility or to target the immune system? Why do HIV patients have worsened allergies?
Dig deep. You have better odds than I do to find the answer to these questions.