Am I wrong? The Bible says the mark of the beast WILL happen. Assuming the mark is what most "conspiracy theorists" says it is that means that the globaly "win"
Are you saying God has somehow protected his word? I don't think that is a valid assumption. If God protects his word then why has it been divided into thousands of different translations? Why is it when I read my Bible some verses say "these verses aren't found in earlier manuscripts"
The Bible is clearly corruptible and the only real reason I can give is that the elites use it to manipulate people.
The Bible in anything other than the actual first peace of parchment is a copy. The Bible has been preserved though extremely careful recopying in a time when people actually paid attention to what they were doing and got things right. The SENSE of what is communicated through the english, or whatever modern language you read it in, is where the truth is at. Language is not 1 for 1 in the translating world so it is very important to study context and culture of when it was written and when it is being studied at to what it is communicating. We have more Bible in this world than any other book stored in hard copy and digital sources and we would need to get into specific chapter and verse to understand why certain translations say one thing verses another. The Bible, in general, is not a corrupted as people may think especially if they start looking down that rabbit hole. Revelation is not fake but it leads itself to misinterpretations because of it's intentional "big picture" take on the future.
Your name "RetardMoron" says it all.
No need for further comment.
Am I wrong? The Bible says the mark of the beast WILL happen. Assuming the mark is what most "conspiracy theorists" says it is that means that the globaly "win"
People have been seeing the end of the world or the mark of the beast for ages. People thought Napoleon was the antichrist.
if the deepstate / cabal is real, why would they let an accurate bible survive?
very good question my friend.
Are you saying God has somehow protected his word? I don't think that is a valid assumption. If God protects his word then why has it been divided into thousands of different translations? Why is it when I read my Bible some verses say "these verses aren't found in earlier manuscripts"
The Bible is clearly corruptible and the only real reason I can give is that the elites use it to manipulate people.
Are you saying Revelations is fake?
The Bible in anything other than the actual first peace of parchment is a copy. The Bible has been preserved though extremely careful recopying in a time when people actually paid attention to what they were doing and got things right. The SENSE of what is communicated through the english, or whatever modern language you read it in, is where the truth is at. Language is not 1 for 1 in the translating world so it is very important to study context and culture of when it was written and when it is being studied at to what it is communicating. We have more Bible in this world than any other book stored in hard copy and digital sources and we would need to get into specific chapter and verse to understand why certain translations say one thing verses another. The Bible, in general, is not a corrupted as people may think especially if they start looking down that rabbit hole. Revelation is not fake but it leads itself to misinterpretations because of it's intentional "big picture" take on the future.