He should explain 50 according to what figures.

Here in the UK, we are being held hostage by means of an 'invisible' dataset being published, but not promoted, in the middle of the MSM 'bookends'. So it just sits there quietly nestling in the bowels of our government website where no-one can accidentally stumble across it, and with no attention drawn to its existence, know it exists to go looking for it in the first place.

What we get daily is:

a) The media blaring the 'case' numbers. However, slight problem in that in mainstream reporting terms, and as the government has been complicit in helping the narrative dominate without stepping in, is the number of 'Positive Test Results'. So in other words, all the non-symptomatic numpties complying with testing, and then being told they 'have Covid-19' thanks to the 40+ cycle. So at least as well as virtue signalling, you can have affinity with a Tanzanian papaya. This is where we get our daily, reinforced lashing of "THOUSANDS OF CASES!! COVID STILL RAMPANT!!" from that is keeping the majority of the population sufficiently terrified.

c) The 'death' numbers, which are dependent completely upon whoever decides to write 'Covid-19' on the death certificate, despite what you might have actually primarily died from. We already have the admitted standard practice of C19 being designated AUTOMATICALLY if you had a 'positive' test result - for the worth of the used toilet paper those are written on - in the last 60 days before you bought the farm. And the anecdotal accounts on forums, message boards, comments sections are legions from aggrieved people about their loved ones being assigned as C19 deaths, as opposed to heaven forfend an unfortunate demise such as falling off a ladder and squishing one's brain, and their battle to get the death certs corrected.

But what of b) you may be asking?

Well, 'b', would be the government's statutory Notification of Infection Diseases weekly report, NOIDS, the one based on actual clinical case data returned by registered medical practitioners across the field for each week. Not the stick up your nose, not the paid-by-whoever coroner, no. The actual, practising, hippocratical doctor who saw a patient that week and decided they likely had C19.

Here is the latest 'report B' for week ending 28 February 2020. Scroll down to page 14 for CONvid.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/966584/NOIDS-weekly-report-week8-2021.pdf

And for 'authentication', here's the gov. link to the report so it's not 'made up' https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notifiable-diseases-weekly-reports-for-2021

Surprised? Mildly shocked? Don't think this isn't the scenario in the US either. Media and optics trump truth, so long as you don't 'bury' truth irretrievably but just tuck it somewhere inconspicuous so as to later be able to pull out and say "Ah, but we never lied, the data was always available, it was just a flaw in the understanding of communication mechanisms".

BASTARDS. Fucking CUNTS. Execution would be wasted on them for how little it would atone for the cost of the manipulation and deception they've pulled off.