I know we've all been burned a number of times by now and are skeptical of everything, but I have not seen George give any message so far that contradicts what we already know. They don't give us wild claims (like everyone's already been arrested, etc--might be true, might not, but they aren't saying things like this). They have seemed very professional and very guarded in what they discuss and what they don't. There are many questions that have been asked of them re: behind the scenes "habbenings" and insider scoop of various kinds, but they always respond very appropriately--they are clearly NOT giving "outside comms" along those lines (assuming their legit) or making up stuff people want to hear (if they're not). The closest they've come to "outside comms" is giving hints that might point toward various drops or info we already have. I don't see that as a problem. We already look into everything anyway just in case we find something.

They have also called out Charlie Ward and Simon Parkes (didn't say their names, but the reference was clear in the conversation) and others for claiming to have spoken with Q, because there are no outside comms. He has reiterated multiple times that it's very important to be careful who we follow and has explained excellent reasoning for this for newbies who may not know yet, and while they refused to name specific names, they gave excellent parameters for discerning for ourselves: claims of having insider sources or "talking to Q", giving firm dates for when things will happen and then changing them when they don't happen, etc.

Besides, if white hats really are in control like we keep saying, and GeorgeNews has the kind of access they say they have, they potentially could land on any platform they want, so I don't see that connection as being necessarily conclusive one way or the other. They do have a lot of typos at times, but they've also told us that they are only on mobile devices for these accounts, and IMHO, I don't see the kinds of mistakes I usually see from non-native English speakers. That goes way beyond typos and apostrophes into sentence structure, vocabulary, idioms, etc. Incidentally, I saw one interchange where someone called them out about misspellings and punctuation, and their response was, "Did it get you to read the message more than twice? Mission accomplished." I found that very interesting. NOT saying they're Q (I don't think they are), but that WAS a very "Q-esque" response.

Above all, they just continue to encourage us that the plan is still moving ahead and that POTUS is still keeping his promises. I think it is also very significant that they are consistently posting POTUS' new statements on their telegram BEFORE they are posted on POTUS' official website. I don't know how you would do that without legitimate access. I think Evspra brings up good points to consider, and I really appreciate the digging, but if they actually ARE a gov't/military/insider entity close to POTUS (as they seem to claim), then some of these other anomalies may be explainable by their unusual role in the current mission. They are clearly NOT revealing their actual individual identities--other news outlets tell you who the reporters are! They don't. I find that very interesting. Too many other things have seemed to add up concerning their message, and I find this increasingly true as I have been looking back through their old videos (including through CollectiveQ/Anonymous Charity)--there are some very interesting connections there with things we are seeing today. I'm personally not ready to write them off yet, but as always, use discernment. If their message starts to contradict what Q has taught us, that's a different story.