To me the most compelling argument is that the content they posted claiming it to be their own happened to be taken from some site, and they banned when asked about it.
If nothing else, this alone cannot be forgiven or explained away. They are fraudsters through and through. Q was always prepared to prove their validity, like when several anons asked for more AF1 pics and they managed to post some that were just seconds apart from the ones they'd posted long before. If GEORGE LARP cannot produce that kind of smackdown rebuttal and instead choose to CENSOR and BAN all dissenting opinions like FASCISTS, then that proves whose side they're REALLY on.
I agree. This is pretty damning. I suppose it could be a case of a young, over zealous social media editor who banned without considering the consequences, but after this, nothing short of working a word into a Trump speech would convince me that George is real. Something innocuous and flexible in meaning that could be easily concealed in context, like "tiddly winks".
If nothing else, this alone cannot be forgiven or explained away. They are fraudsters through and through. Q was always prepared to prove their validity, like when several anons asked for more AF1 pics and they managed to post some that were just seconds apart from the ones they'd posted long before. If GEORGE LARP cannot produce that kind of smackdown rebuttal and instead choose to CENSOR and BAN all dissenting opinions like FASCISTS, then that proves whose side they're REALLY on.
I agree. This is pretty damning. I suppose it could be a case of a young, over zealous social media editor who banned without considering the consequences, but after this, nothing short of working a word into a Trump speech would convince me that George is real. Something innocuous and flexible in meaning that could be easily concealed in context, like "tiddly winks".