Whatever “George’s” motive, (may be as simple as someone somewhere in the media world being savvy enough to continue to attempt to profit off of President Donald J. Trump, the Kennedy’s, “conspiracies” and/or the movement.
They saw the writing on the wall:
DJT still moves the needle.
ChinaJoBama is a bummer. (Incidentally, these people all must be an absolute joy at parties).
Either way, [logic and reasoning] must prevail in the end.
Evspra, if you came on to a site where I was a mod, and you made an arbitrary loaded accusation like that, I would zorch it in a heartbeat without looking a thing up. There are right ways to pursue inquiries, and that's not one.
For instance, the mere instance of video being on that site does not mean that George stole it. George may have been the original source. If thievery is actually involved, why jump to conclusions as to who is guilty?
And in this thread, you've not indicated the exact material in question, so the autists here have nothing to pick at.
If someone makes what is essentially a criminal accusation (IP theft) in a public forum without indicating the exact material in question. --I'd punt that right out, and I'd be an excellent mod.
Credibility is key. Kudos for digging, E!
Whatever “George’s” motive, (may be as simple as someone somewhere in the media world being savvy enough to continue to attempt to profit off of President Donald J. Trump, the Kennedy’s, “conspiracies” and/or the movement.
They saw the writing on the wall: DJT still moves the needle. ChinaJoBama is a bummer. (Incidentally, these people all must be an absolute joy at parties).
Either way, [logic and reasoning] must prevail in the end.
Sux it took this to show everybody that people that question EVERYTHING!!!
"I asked them why they were stealing videos from https://www.dvidshub.net/search and claiming them to be theirs."
Evspra, if you came on to a site where I was a mod, and you made an arbitrary loaded accusation like that, I would zorch it in a heartbeat without looking a thing up. There are right ways to pursue inquiries, and that's not one.
For instance, the mere instance of video being on that site does not mean that George stole it. George may have been the original source. If thievery is actually involved, why jump to conclusions as to who is guilty?
And in this thread, you've not indicated the exact material in question, so the autists here have nothing to pick at.
If someone makes what is essentially a criminal accusation (IP theft) in a public forum without indicating the exact material in question. --I'd punt that right out, and I'd be an excellent mod.
Legit verifications are not shill worthy.