"They closed comments instead of answering a simple question"
Loaded questions are not "simple questions". Any question. posed in public in an "attack journalism" style that comes in the form of "How do you explain this reprehensible thing I'm accusing you of doing?" <stuff mic in face> ....is a loaded question.
Such is the stock-and-trade of commies and spooks, and it sets off the spidey sense every time.
They answered a number of these questions before closing comments, and they claim that part of why they are closing comments is because their bots were banning people unnecessarily, and they're working to fix that. At least twice they said that they work with DVIDS, which explains the shared comments. They have also been VERY clear about no outside comms and have warned about people (like Charlie and Simon, etc) who claim insider sources/talking to Q, set dates, move dates, etc. They explained why they used to have different names (Anonymous Charity, Collective Q). Their replies can get pretty buried in the comments, but they DID answer these questions.
"They closed comments instead of answering a simple question"
Loaded questions are not "simple questions". Any question. posed in public in an "attack journalism" style that comes in the form of "How do you explain this reprehensible thing I'm accusing you of doing?" <stuff mic in face> ....is a loaded question.
Such is the stock-and-trade of commies and spooks, and it sets off the spidey sense every time.
They answered a number of these questions before closing comments, and they claim that part of why they are closing comments is because their bots were banning people unnecessarily, and they're working to fix that. At least twice they said that they work with DVIDS, which explains the shared comments. They have also been VERY clear about no outside comms and have warned about people (like Charlie and Simon, etc) who claim insider sources/talking to Q, set dates, move dates, etc. They explained why they used to have different names (Anonymous Charity, Collective Q). Their replies can get pretty buried in the comments, but they DID answer these questions.
The source material is not in question. with george, it seems to be george sourcing material instead of citing source material.
34 days isn't exactly a handshake account.
3.4 day, yeah....
What does the handshake mean?
A new account, especially one implied to exist only to incessently upvote (shake hands with) a main account to fluff its statistics.
Thanks!