They answered a number of these questions before closing comments, and they claim that part of why they are closing comments is because their bots were banning people unnecessarily, and they're working to fix that. At least twice they said that they work with DVIDS, which explains the shared comments. They have also been VERY clear about no outside comms and have warned about people (like Charlie and Simon, etc) who claim insider sources/talking to Q, set dates, move dates, etc. They explained why they used to have different names (Anonymous Charity, Collective Q). Their replies can get pretty buried in the comments, but they DID answer these questions.
"They closed comments instead of answering a simple question"
Loaded questions are not "simple questions". Any question. posed in public in an "attack journalism" style that comes in the form of "How do you explain this reprehensible thing I'm accusing you of doing?" <stuff mic in face> ....is a loaded question.
Such is the stock-and-trade of commies and spooks, and it sets off the spidey sense every time.
What sparked this sudden anti-George thing anyway?
Haven't even seen any reasons as to why, just people saying it's compromised and sounding like leftists attacking something.
The only thing I've seen is that it's because they use videos that aren't theirs, even though they always show the credit. Again, these sound like leftist tactics.
Dave made a mistake when he was posting George News related posts on his videos
You need to provide sauce for this claim.
I listen to X22 every night -- he never once mentioned that he pulled something directly from George.
The only time I ever hear him mention stuff is he says "The BOARDS." I believe he means the Q Drop boards as well as MB's like this. IF he pulls info from a source he gives that source credit.
Provide once example of him quoting George. I haven't heard it.
Actually He brought up George news on Yesterdays X 22 report. Listen to it all the way through. First time I’ve ever heard him bring up George before ...I was a little surprised
We should be researching and we should care about the truth but we should be careful on who we smear. People make mistakes even when trying not to. Do we really bring Dave into this George thing? The best thing would be to give him the info that was uncovered, as he is a brother in arms, then let him decide, and go from there.
What you are doing reminds me of Monty Python:
A witch! A witch! A witch! We found a witch! We've got a witch! A witch! A witch! We have found a witch. May we burn her?
The best thing would be to give him the info that was uncovered
What info is that? Someone said they got banned from GN for asking?
I got downvoted here for posting the contact info to DVIDS (defense.gov) and telling folks if they care just asked them about George News.
What I'm seeing here is a bunch of people that don't want to know, they just want to jump on a bandwagon. You can tell a liberal by the fruit they bear and I'm seeing a lot of rotten apples on this site.
The moderator has posted good info to take into account. I didnt down vote you. I dont know enough about many things yet. But I do know the bible says if you have a dispute to bring it to that person. If they don't listen, bring a brother, if they still don't listen bring it to the council.
I dont want to see this place devolve or our patriot movement devolve. Each person has value and can uplift or bring destruction. And when we feel wronged, to being that wrong up to the person. Take care
Well each must make up their own mind. The moderator has come up with good info. Bringing dave into it when you aren't sure yourself isn't helpful to him. I appreciate your explanation. I think it is best to see what the moderator found and inform Dave if you think it is good info. I was suspicious of George but I still passed his link on to a couple of people. I am not without fault.
I agree! That’s where I heard of George News (X22). I think Dave has really good intel and connections. He seems to know what pathway the white hats are taking and is informing us as events happen. Anyways, doesn’t really matter since NCSWIC!! That’s why I do not understand so much resistance against George News. To each his own, right?
Dave at X22 report only has published/posted articles to go off . Dave interprets the situation from these , I do not believe Dave has special access to secret information. I don’t believe Dave is trying to purposely mislead anyone , he just puts the recent happenings into a 40 minute podcast for those who don’t have the time to scour the internet and news outlets.
Many in here were drawn into the George News thing. So I can see Dave getting drawn in as well. No one is perfect but thanks to Evspra we all know George News is a sham.
In light of that fact:
Let's see if Dave on X22 tells us to avoid them too.
Bards has also referred to GeorgeNews more than once and has been on the late night chat a couple times--told people to go to their chat and say "hi" after his show. On their old Anonymous charity/Collective Q twitter archive there is a very friendly convo between them and Lisa Mei Crawley. Joe M also shows up there. Cue the Marines has reposted things from their telegram. I just watched Amazing Polly's episode about the CDC manipulating the flu, etc in order to push vaccines, and lo and behold, behind her and to the right of the screen (so, kind of behind her left shoulder) there is a little plaque or something that says "George" on it. May or may not be relevant or related to THAT George, but given today's conversations here it jumped out at me. George has suggested that people follow Garrett Ziegler (calls him Mr. G) and as well as Mike Flynn, Mike Pompeo, and Dan Scavino, to name a few. He also said MonkeyWerx is worth paying attention to. We the Media also reposts content from them, as has GhostEzra (I know there are mixed feelings here about him). What other connections have others found between them and other people (either people you trust or people you don't?).
FWIW, George has refused to give a list of names of anons/podcasters who they consider trustworthy or not, but he has given parameters (must not make claims of having insider sources or "talking to Q", setting firm dates, changing dates after they don't happen, etc) and has confirmed that at least 3 people are NOT trustworthy (people asked questions and he answered with another question that clearly pointed this direction): Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, and Jordan Sather.
I'm just pointing this out because, as well as providing solid principles regarding who to follow or not and reinforcing the correctness of no outside comms, the people he recommends are people most of us already generally consider trustworthy, and he is NOT supporting some of the people we've already written off. To put it another way, for example, if he was saying to pay attention to Charlie and Simon, that would be a bigger red flag to me personally than the fact that they sell t-shirts, use video content they share with another military group they claim to be on the same team as, share hints that may direct us toward drops and info we've already been given, etc. The jury is still out for me, to be honest. If they start saying stuff that is clearly incompatible with what Trump and Q have already told us or other clearly "incriminating" evidence comes out against them, I am not unwilling to admit if I/we have been deceived. But, at this point, there are some things that raise concerns, but I have seen them answer most, if not all, of these questions today with reasonable explanations.
For all of us that listen to Dave everyday we all know he has ZERO inside information. Everything he talks about most of us already know and read the day before cruising our standard daily q sites on the internet. He simply interprets everything we read daily and compiles it all into a well thought out podcast to bring all the tidbits from the day before into one drop to summarize the days events. He offers good perspective of everything but all he really does is provide a compiled hopium sandwich to his listeners 6 days a week while selling you VPN's, dietary products and survival gear on the side. I will still listen to him every night as opposed to any propaganda on regular TV or streaming service.
Cold hard truth is X22 got as much information and knowledge as any of us.
He simply grabbing at anything he got that related to Q posts and make contents...simple as that.
We need to stop worshiping influencers. I don't think X22 is doing anything bad, I hope he address his thoughts on Evspra findings though as SO MANY PEOPLE are wasting money donating to George News.
Do not hand out your money unless you know their real identities...simple life lesson here.
Dave's recent attempts in his "financial" broadcast, attempting to tie the movement to the sudden rise in bitcoin/crypto has really surprised me. IMHO, this is very poor analysis that can't possibly be correct. Crypto is keeping big money away from precious metals. It's as simple as that.
If CNBC is touting crypto day in and day out, which they have been for years, there's zero chance that "it's the way forward".
All that being said, I realize crypto investors are making the big bucks at the moment. No doubt. Not suggesting some hedged investments aren't a good idea. Just that, in the end, crypto goes the way of the fedbuck "dollar" in the end.
Bad analysis Dave. "Patriots" aren't, and never have been, in "control" of the crypto price. Not one chance in a million. Not in the past 5 years, and certainly not now. Crypto is fully under the control of the "Technocrats" -- then --- and now.
I'd advise Dave to refer to Adminral Ackbar's famous quote and re-evaluate his message. Otherwise, he's lost a listener going forward...
Not "bad". It's an economic diversion, not a "solution".
The cabal's goal is to habituate us to it, then shift to their "FedCoin" which will give them complete control over our lives.
I'm not saying you can't make some big bucks in the near-term with it. Because obviously, you can!! Therefore, not "bad". It's just another "instrument" to invest in at the moment. That's all.
Running to crypto is just one of many strategies for dumping the already devalued FedBux (fiat dollar) - nearing worthlessness as we speak. Crypto isn't the cause, but rather the effect of a growing awareness about the fake, fraudulent, fiat FedBux.
I have to agree with you. This might be the next shill attack. Lets not attack a site until we find out the facts. We are suppose to be researchers
They answered a number of these questions before closing comments, and they claim that part of why they are closing comments is because their bots were banning people unnecessarily, and they're working to fix that. At least twice they said that they work with DVIDS, which explains the shared comments. They have also been VERY clear about no outside comms and have warned about people (like Charlie and Simon, etc) who claim insider sources/talking to Q, set dates, move dates, etc. They explained why they used to have different names (Anonymous Charity, Collective Q). Their replies can get pretty buried in the comments, but they DID answer these questions.
"They closed comments instead of answering a simple question"
Loaded questions are not "simple questions". Any question. posed in public in an "attack journalism" style that comes in the form of "How do you explain this reprehensible thing I'm accusing you of doing?" <stuff mic in face> ....is a loaded question.
Such is the stock-and-trade of commies and spooks, and it sets off the spidey sense every time.
The source material is not in question. with george, it seems to be george sourcing material instead of citing source material.
34 days isn't exactly a handshake account.
3.4 day, yeah....
What does the handshake mean?
A new account, especially one implied to exist only to incessently upvote (shake hands with) a main account to fluff its statistics.
100%!
I agree I have been banned a few times here for practicing my 1st A
What sparked this sudden anti-George thing anyway?
Haven't even seen any reasons as to why, just people saying it's compromised and sounding like leftists attacking something.
The only thing I've seen is that it's because they use videos that aren't theirs, even though they always show the credit. Again, these sound like leftist tactics.
Nevermind, just read the sticky.
Dave’s not alone. Most got duped!
You need to provide sauce for this claim.
I listen to X22 every night -- he never once mentioned that he pulled something directly from George.
The only time I ever hear him mention stuff is he says "The BOARDS." I believe he means the Q Drop boards as well as MB's like this. IF he pulls info from a source he gives that source credit.
Provide once example of him quoting George. I haven't heard it.
Actually He brought up George news on Yesterdays X 22 report. Listen to it all the way through. First time I’ve ever heard him bring up George before ...I was a little surprised
Okay. He speculated like us that Hello George may have been talking about George News. You found one example. Well done.
That's a far cry from
What posts are you talking about? Social media posts?
I don't do social media, but IF that's where he posted then yes, please provide.
I heard him mentioned George News this morning...
He did tonight as well.
He didn't address this? Uh oh.
He didn't.
We should be researching and we should care about the truth but we should be careful on who we smear. People make mistakes even when trying not to. Do we really bring Dave into this George thing? The best thing would be to give him the info that was uncovered, as he is a brother in arms, then let him decide, and go from there.
What you are doing reminds me of Monty Python:
A witch! A witch! A witch! We found a witch! We've got a witch! A witch! A witch! We have found a witch. May we burn her?
Are we really that petty?
What info is that? Someone said they got banned from GN for asking?
I got downvoted here for posting the contact info to DVIDS (defense.gov) and telling folks if they care just asked them about George News.
What I'm seeing here is a bunch of people that don't want to know, they just want to jump on a bandwagon. You can tell a liberal by the fruit they bear and I'm seeing a lot of rotten apples on this site.
The moderator has posted good info to take into account. I didnt down vote you. I dont know enough about many things yet. But I do know the bible says if you have a dispute to bring it to that person. If they don't listen, bring a brother, if they still don't listen bring it to the council.
I dont want to see this place devolve or our patriot movement devolve. Each person has value and can uplift or bring destruction. And when we feel wronged, to being that wrong up to the person. Take care
Well each must make up their own mind. The moderator has come up with good info. Bringing dave into it when you aren't sure yourself isn't helpful to him. I appreciate your explanation. I think it is best to see what the moderator found and inform Dave if you think it is good info. I was suspicious of George but I still passed his link on to a couple of people. I am not without fault.
I agree! That’s where I heard of George News (X22). I think Dave has really good intel and connections. He seems to know what pathway the white hats are taking and is informing us as events happen. Anyways, doesn’t really matter since NCSWIC!! That’s why I do not understand so much resistance against George News. To each his own, right?
Dave at X22 report only has published/posted articles to go off . Dave interprets the situation from these , I do not believe Dave has special access to secret information. I don’t believe Dave is trying to purposely mislead anyone , he just puts the recent happenings into a 40 minute podcast for those who don’t have the time to scour the internet and news outlets.
IF people are saying that George is not real because they are asking for money. In my view.. That makes them more legit.
It takes time and money to run a legit news source. One that incurr many cost.
So I am hoping they are not getting slammed over money.
Many in here were drawn into the George News thing. So I can see Dave getting drawn in as well. No one is perfect but thanks to Evspra we all know George News is a sham.
In light of that fact: Let's see if Dave on X22 tells us to avoid them too.
Bards has also referred to GeorgeNews more than once and has been on the late night chat a couple times--told people to go to their chat and say "hi" after his show. On their old Anonymous charity/Collective Q twitter archive there is a very friendly convo between them and Lisa Mei Crawley. Joe M also shows up there. Cue the Marines has reposted things from their telegram. I just watched Amazing Polly's episode about the CDC manipulating the flu, etc in order to push vaccines, and lo and behold, behind her and to the right of the screen (so, kind of behind her left shoulder) there is a little plaque or something that says "George" on it. May or may not be relevant or related to THAT George, but given today's conversations here it jumped out at me. George has suggested that people follow Garrett Ziegler (calls him Mr. G) and as well as Mike Flynn, Mike Pompeo, and Dan Scavino, to name a few. He also said MonkeyWerx is worth paying attention to. We the Media also reposts content from them, as has GhostEzra (I know there are mixed feelings here about him). What other connections have others found between them and other people (either people you trust or people you don't?).
FWIW, George has refused to give a list of names of anons/podcasters who they consider trustworthy or not, but he has given parameters (must not make claims of having insider sources or "talking to Q", setting firm dates, changing dates after they don't happen, etc) and has confirmed that at least 3 people are NOT trustworthy (people asked questions and he answered with another question that clearly pointed this direction): Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, and Jordan Sather.
I'm just pointing this out because, as well as providing solid principles regarding who to follow or not and reinforcing the correctness of no outside comms, the people he recommends are people most of us already generally consider trustworthy, and he is NOT supporting some of the people we've already written off. To put it another way, for example, if he was saying to pay attention to Charlie and Simon, that would be a bigger red flag to me personally than the fact that they sell t-shirts, use video content they share with another military group they claim to be on the same team as, share hints that may direct us toward drops and info we've already been given, etc. The jury is still out for me, to be honest. If they start saying stuff that is clearly incompatible with what Trump and Q have already told us or other clearly "incriminating" evidence comes out against them, I am not unwilling to admit if I/we have been deceived. But, at this point, there are some things that raise concerns, but I have seen them answer most, if not all, of these questions today with reasonable explanations.
For all of us that listen to Dave everyday we all know he has ZERO inside information. Everything he talks about most of us already know and read the day before cruising our standard daily q sites on the internet. He simply interprets everything we read daily and compiles it all into a well thought out podcast to bring all the tidbits from the day before into one drop to summarize the days events. He offers good perspective of everything but all he really does is provide a compiled hopium sandwich to his listeners 6 days a week while selling you VPN's, dietary products and survival gear on the side. I will still listen to him every night as opposed to any propaganda on regular TV or streaming service.
I've always been skeptical of Dave
Cold hard truth is X22 got as much information and knowledge as any of us.
He simply grabbing at anything he got that related to Q posts and make contents...simple as that.
We need to stop worshiping influencers. I don't think X22 is doing anything bad, I hope he address his thoughts on Evspra findings though as SO MANY PEOPLE are wasting money donating to George News.
Do not hand out your money unless you know their real identities...simple life lesson here.
Ezpooge the meat-headerator and Kitty5 are comped 4 sure
Dave's recent attempts in his "financial" broadcast, attempting to tie the movement to the sudden rise in bitcoin/crypto has really surprised me. IMHO, this is very poor analysis that can't possibly be correct. Crypto is keeping big money away from precious metals. It's as simple as that.
If CNBC is touting crypto day in and day out, which they have been for years, there's zero chance that "it's the way forward".
All that being said, I realize crypto investors are making the big bucks at the moment. No doubt. Not suggesting some hedged investments aren't a good idea. Just that, in the end, crypto goes the way of the fedbuck "dollar" in the end.
Bad analysis Dave. "Patriots" aren't, and never have been, in "control" of the crypto price. Not one chance in a million. Not in the past 5 years, and certainly not now. Crypto is fully under the control of the "Technocrats" -- then --- and now.
I'd advise Dave to refer to Adminral Ackbar's famous quote and re-evaluate his message. Otherwise, he's lost a listener going forward...
Not "bad". It's an economic diversion, not a "solution".
The cabal's goal is to habituate us to it, then shift to their "FedCoin" which will give them complete control over our lives.
I'm not saying you can't make some big bucks in the near-term with it. Because obviously, you can!! Therefore, not "bad". It's just another "instrument" to invest in at the moment. That's all.
Running to crypto is just one of many strategies for dumping the already devalued FedBux (fiat dollar) - nearing worthlessness as we speak. Crypto isn't the cause, but rather the effect of a growing awareness about the fake, fraudulent, fiat FedBux.