Bards has also referred to GeorgeNews more than once and has been on the late night chat a couple times--told people to go to their chat and say "hi" after his show. On their old Anonymous charity/Collective Q twitter archive there is a very friendly convo between them and Lisa Mei Crawley. Joe M also shows up there. Cue the Marines has reposted things from their telegram. I just watched Amazing Polly's episode about the CDC manipulating the flu, etc in order to push vaccines, and lo and behold, behind her and to the right of the screen (so, kind of behind her left shoulder) there is a little plaque or something that says "George" on it. May or may not be relevant or related to THAT George, but given today's conversations here it jumped out at me. George has suggested that people follow Garrett Ziegler (calls him Mr. G) and as well as Mike Flynn, Mike Pompeo, and Dan Scavino, to name a few. He also said MonkeyWerx is worth paying attention to. We the Media also reposts content from them, as has GhostEzra (I know there are mixed feelings here about him). What other connections have others found between them and other people (either people you trust or people you don't?).
FWIW, George has refused to give a list of names of anons/podcasters who they consider trustworthy or not, but he has given parameters (must not make claims of having insider sources or "talking to Q", setting firm dates, changing dates after they don't happen, etc) and has confirmed that at least 3 people are NOT trustworthy (people asked questions and he answered with another question that clearly pointed this direction): Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, and Jordan Sather.
I'm just pointing this out because, as well as providing solid principles regarding who to follow or not and reinforcing the correctness of no outside comms, the people he recommends are people most of us already generally consider trustworthy, and he is NOT supporting some of the people we've already written off. To put it another way, for example, if he was saying to pay attention to Charlie and Simon, that would be a bigger red flag to me personally than the fact that they sell t-shirts, use video content they share with another military group they claim to be on the same team as, share hints that may direct us toward drops and info we've already been given, etc. The jury is still out for me, to be honest. If they start saying stuff that is clearly incompatible with what Trump and Q have already told us or other clearly "incriminating" evidence comes out against them, I am not unwilling to admit if I/we have been deceived. But, at this point, there are some things that raise concerns, but I have seen them answer most, if not all, of these questions today with reasonable explanations.
Bards has also referred to GeorgeNews more than once and has been on the late night chat a couple times--told people to go to their chat and say "hi" after his show. On their old Anonymous charity/Collective Q twitter archive there is a very friendly convo between them and Lisa Mei Crawley. Joe M also shows up there. Cue the Marines has reposted things from their telegram. I just watched Amazing Polly's episode about the CDC manipulating the flu, etc in order to push vaccines, and lo and behold, behind her and to the right of the screen (so, kind of behind her left shoulder) there is a little plaque or something that says "George" on it. May or may not be relevant or related to THAT George, but given today's conversations here it jumped out at me. George has suggested that people follow Garrett Ziegler (calls him Mr. G) and as well as Mike Flynn, Mike Pompeo, and Dan Scavino, to name a few. He also said MonkeyWerx is worth paying attention to. We the Media also reposts content from them, as has GhostEzra (I know there are mixed feelings here about him). What other connections have others found between them and other people (either people you trust or people you don't?).
FWIW, George has refused to give a list of names of anons/podcasters who they consider trustworthy or not, but he has given parameters (must not make claims of having insider sources or "talking to Q", setting firm dates, changing dates after they don't happen, etc) and has confirmed that at least 3 people are NOT trustworthy (people asked questions and he answered with another question that clearly pointed this direction): Charlie Ward, Simon Parkes, and Jordan Sather.
I'm just pointing this out because, as well as providing solid principles regarding who to follow or not and reinforcing the correctness of no outside comms, the people he recommends are people most of us already generally consider trustworthy, and he is NOT supporting some of the people we've already written off. To put it another way, for example, if he was saying to pay attention to Charlie and Simon, that would be a bigger red flag to me personally than the fact that they sell t-shirts, use video content they share with another military group they claim to be on the same team as, share hints that may direct us toward drops and info we've already been given, etc. The jury is still out for me, to be honest. If they start saying stuff that is clearly incompatible with what Trump and Q have already told us or other clearly "incriminating" evidence comes out against them, I am not unwilling to admit if I/we have been deceived. But, at this point, there are some things that raise concerns, but I have seen them answer most, if not all, of these questions today with reasonable explanations.