Browsed through article and images of sketches etc.
Read bb-18 is type of fuse connection terminal that allows for ease of modification plus quicker alterations.
noted the ‘gelatin’ word play/ reference to explosive charges.
Noted the placement of external balcony and unfettered access to the structure.
Read statement that the ‘art project’ was in same location as the ‘cartoon images’ of the aluminum plane damaging or destroying steel supports.
Also recall claims from time of attack that all Israeli and most Jewish people were not present at time of wtc collapse.
Assuming, arguendo, that all of the foregoing is accurate, why would so many “clues” have been left by the people orchestrating the attack?
Why allow or announce to newspaper that art exhibit is going on and let them take pics of fuse boxes?
Why have a public name ‘gelatin’ or whatever it was that could be so easily tied to the type of explosives that were purported to take down the towers?
Why would a book with weird sketches like that be published after the attack?
I am not taking any certain position on the veracity of the claims, just asking questions regarding the breadcrumbs left behind that the article describes.
In my mind, I can’t think of any reason why a complex operation would INTENTIONALLY leave all of these “clues” behind, almost asking to be caught.
Browsed through article and images of sketches etc. Read bb-18 is type of fuse connection terminal that allows for ease of modification plus quicker alterations. noted the ‘gelatin’ word play/ reference to explosive charges. Noted the placement of external balcony and unfettered access to the structure. Read statement that the ‘art project’ was in same location as the ‘cartoon images’ of the aluminum plane damaging or destroying steel supports.
Also recall claims from time of attack that all Israeli and most Jewish people were not present at time of wtc collapse.
Assuming, arguendo, that all of the foregoing is accurate, why would so many “clues” have been left by the people orchestrating the attack?
Why allow or announce to newspaper that art exhibit is going on and let them take pics of fuse boxes?
Why have a public name ‘gelatin’ or whatever it was that could be so easily tied to the type of explosives that were purported to take down the towers?
Why would a book with weird sketches like that be published after the attack?
I am not taking any certain position on the veracity of the claims, just asking questions regarding the breadcrumbs left behind that the article describes.
In my mind, I can’t think of any reason why a complex operation would INTENTIONALLY leave all of these “clues” behind, almost asking to be caught.
Thoughts?