That’s splitting hairs. Most of the discussion on GAW is what I described and is the point I was making. Whether it’s someone farming discussion is another issue.
I’m not sure what you mean about splitting hairs. I am just making a statement I believe to be true.
This board is swarming with trolls, shills, and an army of sock-puppets. The controlled opposition goal is to control the narrative.
Making a statement like “everyone on this board does this or that” is still meaningless in a forum where you have no idea who is who and how many people are really just one person. Throwing everyone into a bucket and say “GAW says” is the same tactic the fake news media uses when reporting on this board. What the mods think is a different story.
I personally have no opinion on George news and when I see a post about them specifically, I just keep scrolling. Although this recent drama surrounding them has peaked my interest.
If I see a headline being reported on George news, I’ll click it to learn more, but I work to discern the truth in the content and not throw out the content based on the source.
No, they haven't. They've been accused by a singular mod of being illegitimate and the same mod banned posts to George within 3 hours of his initial 'a look into' post. They've been accused but they haven't been exposed yet were banned anyway.
Exactly, we are no better than twitter when mods start excluding info to protect the group. The people in this forum can decide for them selves what is true and what is not.
I agree with this 100%. Banning an information source that in my opinion has up to this point produced info not readily found elsewhere simply because it may or
May not be original seems completely idiotic. I don’t care if it’s original or not. I care if it’s informative or not. To say “they banned me for posting links to xyz site” so that’s proof and now THEY are banned is the most ironic reason I’ve heard in a long time. I don’t need to be protected from
Information by some
rando mod. We are turning into liberals right before
Our eyes and many are applauding it. You guys do realize the world is in the state it is in because along the way people decided to leave the critical thinking up to somebody else, right? What a shame.
I’m suggesting that you’re reading too far into what I said towards the wrong direction.
My implication was that most of the people commenting in GAW at the moment are commenting in hive mind fashion based off of misguided findings. I’m not suggesting that all users on that board do this or that. I’m talking about the majority of comments I’ve read today including from a mod.
I personally read GAW everyday and make posts there when I see it hasn’t made it on the board yet. I would be putting myself in the same bucket.
All I’m saying is a statement like “most of the people commenting in GAW” is a meaningless statement in a forum where you have no clue how many real people are actually commenting.
You assume because you see a lot of different handles commenting on a topic with a number of upvotes that comments receive is evidence of “a lot of people here think a certain way”.
That’s splitting hairs. Most of the discussion on GAW is what I described and is the point I was making. Whether it’s someone farming discussion is another issue.
I’m not sure what you mean about splitting hairs. I am just making a statement I believe to be true.
This board is swarming with trolls, shills, and an army of sock-puppets. The controlled opposition goal is to control the narrative.
Making a statement like “everyone on this board does this or that” is still meaningless in a forum where you have no idea who is who and how many people are really just one person. Throwing everyone into a bucket and say “GAW says” is the same tactic the fake news media uses when reporting on this board. What the mods think is a different story.
I personally have no opinion on George news and when I see a post about them specifically, I just keep scrolling. Although this recent drama surrounding them has peaked my interest.
If I see a headline being reported on George news, I’ll click it to learn more, but I work to discern the truth in the content and not throw out the content based on the source.
No, they haven't. They've been accused by a singular mod of being illegitimate and the same mod banned posts to George within 3 hours of his initial 'a look into' post. They've been accused but they haven't been exposed yet were banned anyway.
Exactly, we are no better than twitter when mods start excluding info to protect the group. The people in this forum can decide for them selves what is true and what is not.
Censorship is censorship.
I agree with this 100%. Banning an information source that in my opinion has up to this point produced info not readily found elsewhere simply because it may or May not be original seems completely idiotic. I don’t care if it’s original or not. I care if it’s informative or not. To say “they banned me for posting links to xyz site” so that’s proof and now THEY are banned is the most ironic reason I’ve heard in a long time. I don’t need to be protected from Information by some rando mod. We are turning into liberals right before Our eyes and many are applauding it. You guys do realize the world is in the state it is in because along the way people decided to leave the critical thinking up to somebody else, right? What a shame.
I’m suggesting that you’re reading too far into what I said towards the wrong direction.
My implication was that most of the people commenting in GAW at the moment are commenting in hive mind fashion based off of misguided findings. I’m not suggesting that all users on that board do this or that. I’m talking about the majority of comments I’ve read today including from a mod.
I personally read GAW everyday and make posts there when I see it hasn’t made it on the board yet. I would be putting myself in the same bucket.
All I’m saying is a statement like “most of the people commenting in GAW” is a meaningless statement in a forum where you have no clue how many real people are actually commenting.
You assume because you see a lot of different handles commenting on a topic with a number of upvotes that comments receive is evidence of “a lot of people here think a certain way”.
That is a seriously flawed assumption to make.
Understand the tactics the enemy uses against us.
You’re not getting it. Was there a lot of people commenting as I described? Yes. Do I think all users think that way. No.
evidence of “a lot of people here think a certain way”.
I never said this or implied it.
I’m also a participant in GAW