Agreed. GN are PAY-triot grifters trying to leech a profit from Trump supporters. Dig into the details of their site and you find it is being run by leftists (refer to sticky posts under HOT for sauce).
Some anons are too gullible to figure any of that out for themselves, and are here defending GN... which means they never learned the skepticism, critical thinking and analytical skills that Q espoused. Epic fail. Back to remedial Q school for them...
And? They accept donations, but have given wishy-washy responses before about why. Q never asked for OR accepted donations. Pillow guru has asked for and accepted donations; he has been transparent about what they're for.
Georgenews claims to have inside connections and information, yet doesn't explain why they are accepting donations. If they really have inside connections, they should either be getting inside funding support, or they should be clearly stating that they don't and asking for funding support because what they do isn't free. There is no good middle ground.
Agreed. GN are PAY-triot grifters trying to leech a profit from Trump supporters. Dig into the details of their site and you find it is being run by leftists (refer to sticky posts under HOT for sauce).
Some anons are too gullible to figure any of that out for themselves, and are here defending GN... which means they never learned the skepticism, critical thinking and analytical skills that Q espoused. Epic fail. Back to remedial Q school for them...
Many of our earliest anons accept donations to run their programs on sites, provide news. Geeze.
If you accept donations, be transparent and clear about it.
If you say you don't, then don't.
Anything less is disingenuous and very likely malicious.
March madness.
Why is datefagging your response to what I just said?
Not upset, to be clear, just confused.
"Accept" and "ask" are different words for a reason.
And? They accept donations, but have given wishy-washy responses before about why. Q never asked for OR accepted donations. Pillow guru has asked for and accepted donations; he has been transparent about what they're for.
Georgenews claims to have inside connections and information, yet doesn't explain why they are accepting donations. If they really have inside connections, they should either be getting inside funding support, or they should be clearly stating that they don't and asking for funding support because what they do isn't free. There is no good middle ground.
How much money are they making in YT donations? Why make the statement that they will NEVER ask for donations, etc. if the goal is making money?
"It's not about the money. It's about sending a message."
That is what I am concerned with. Paytriot, bullshit. Opinion "infliuencer" , that's more likely..