We've had our Simon Parks; we've had our George News; we've had our Newsmax; we've had our Parler.
All of these were trusted (by many) in the beginning. All of these have been exposed.
It's time people start promoting more skepticism. Just because you want to hear something, doesn't mean it's true.
I know I've seen enough proofs to take Q seriously, at the least. Q said "No outside comms". People are (frankly childishly) pissing that repeated guidance into the wind repeatedly in favor of some cheap hope.
We need to stop promoting ANYONE but Q, without extensive, rigorous, and conclusive proofs.
The new rule should be this: fake until proven true.
Assume images are fake; assume videos are fake; assume it's ALL fake. Build off of what you know isn't. Force those claiming to have information to verify their information.
Being gullible isn't just a "oh well I'm disappointed" problem; it's damaging our cause astronomically. What happens when some freakjob gets the idea to shill us out and then brag about it in the next CNN documentary?
We don't all have to agree on our research. That said, we should attempt to come to some kind of logic and evidence driven consensus before trusting and promoting sources. These consensus proofs should be compiled into an easily distributable "proof" which can be supplied whenever anyone else reacts with skepticism.
We're better than this. Let's start proving it.
This!
People datefag to get hopium, and then when it inevitably falls apart, everyone goes "Wah Q is fake and this proves it!"
If you need hopium 24/7 this isn't the line of operation for you, I think.
Well stated...I agree that so much is fake these days it is Wise to be skeptical of everything in bizarro world out there....how do you propose to accomplish this? This is a safe space for all of us and we need to make sure to keep it to the standards all those who paved the way deserve to have preserved...
Blessings!
Here's the problem we're facing:
When the truth is so weird, weird things start looking like the truth.
Well said!
I mean, like I said, just take it all with a grain of salt until you see sufficient and solid proofs, either found by your own research or made by someone else.
Transparency and sourcing is crucial to maintaining a basis in fact and truth.
True that
Just be skeptical. It's okay to make guesses/assumptions or to be hopeful of certain things, but people here will adopt assumptions and hold them as ABSOLUTE truth. Be open to the idea that something/someone can be bullshit. If someone "decodes" a current event, look at it objectively. Not every single thing introduced/proposed here is going to be a slam dunk. Not every single person who claims to be or have an inside source is telling the truth. In fact, most of them are bullshitting. We all want reasons to keep having faith this will work out, but what good is disregarding your standards and believing something just because it sounds good, only for you to be horribly disappointed in the end? Just be skeptical unless you are provided at least some solid evidence. Even then, keep an open mind that it could still end up being BS.
??
???
yeah it's like a lot of these people have never even read the drops, otherwise they would know not to follow such channels.
pretty obvious a lot of them need to go back and study.
Hell I haven't even read most of them! I just looked at important ones and did enough to verify for myself Q's veracity.
There are like, what, 3000+? I started in November, don't exactly have time or reason to read em all. If NCSWIC my effort is better spent elsewhere.
there's almost 5,000, and I suppose it's more difficult if you weren't there from the beginning,
but it really is something that people need to be spending time on,
especially when you read Bible verses with the drops.
AND much better than wasting time on YT channels that never get to the point?
Also, something happens internally when you take time to study, hence the term Awakening, studying leads to discernment.
Q is trying to reawaken our connection to God, so if you really want to understand, you have to do the homework.
or not, up to you:)
Eh, no matter how good the Q team may be, I don't like conflating them too much with God. I'd rather read the Bible or put my faith to action rather than spending time reading the drops.
"The Great Awakening" might have religious components, but in the sense of Q's plan, I think it's pretty strictly an awakening to what is happening in the world around us. This has lead to a different kind of awakening (or re-awakening) in many; seeing the evil of the world has brought many back to God. That is good, and that is another sort of "Great Awakening"; they may be concurrent or even unified, but I wouldn't assume them to be.
At the end of the day, they're not that different from you or I. They're people that are intelligent, good intentioned, and religious working in politics, the military, and intel. Their plan may be inspired by God. Near as I can tell, it follows God's will. It is not some kind of sacred text, or a religious icon; they are not, either. I (try to) follow God, and God alone; Q seems to be doing what's right, and I support that.
So you are fake?
I could be a bot. I could be a shill. I could be a demon, or a globalist, or a satanist, or an anything. I could also be a concerned patriot.
You have no way of knowing. That said, who I am only matters so much. The message either stands on it's own or doesn't.
Use discernment. Require proofs and evidence from those with claims.
It's a joke, it's been pretty heavy around here today .
IK but it's honestly a fair and legitimate question, so I figured I'd point that out xD
Excellent advice. which will unfortunately be ignored by most of the people on this site...
sad nodding
That should always be the rule.
Of course, but evidently it hasn't been for many.
FAKE, UNLESS IT COMES OUT OF THE MOUTH OF DJT!
Amen!
Awomen, too...
While I was one of the first here to warn about Parler I'm inclined to think that lumping GEORGE in with the rest is likely to prove erroneous...