a few thoughts..
I would have assumed it was public domain off hand..
I would view the embedded logo as a reference to source (as is done in presenting information prepared by others in a paper)
In one sense George News is providing credit for the video by leaving the logo.
In fact it would be more suspect if they blocked it out or overlaid a "George" logo.
In any case it is better than MSM and "Undisclosed source"...
a few thoughts.. I would have assumed it was public domain off hand.. I would view the embedded logo as a reference to source (as is done in presenting information prepared by others in a paper) In one sense George News is providing credit for the video by leaving the logo. In fact it would be more suspect if they blocked it out or overlaid a "George" logo. In any case it is better than MSM and "Undisclosed source"...