Unless it's spam, porn, or that asshole who kept posting shit about his rectum, posts shouldn't be banned. The you tube/facebook technique is lame and fascist. If you don't like Simon Parkes, George, or shit about reptile aliens then don't fucking read it. - The Great Awakening

390

Unless it's spam, porn, or that asshole who kept posting shit about his rectum, posts shouldn't be banned. The you tube/facebook technique is lame and fascist. If you don't like Simon Parkes, George, or shit about reptile aliens then don't fucking read it.

posted 3 years ago by chicagotrauma 3 years ago by chicagotrauma +407 / -17

Let everyone decide what they want to waste their time on. That is all

113 comments

113 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (113)

sorted by:

▲ 8 ▼

– Slyver 8 points 3 years ago +14 / -6

At this point, everything going on in the world is related to Q. Who knows what is relevant?

The point of a discussion board is to bring multiple brains in on the same problem; to think critically. Thinking critically is better accomplished by multiple viewpoints than just one, especially if that one is forced by an echo chamber of censorship.

I'm not suggesting there be no moderation. There are enemies afoot, but moderation should always err on the side of not censoring than the other way around.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +7 / -3

▲ 2 ▼

– Slyver 2 points 3 years ago +7 / -5

And your comment sounds like an excellent foot in the door of the slippery slope of censorship that the Luciferians have used to control the human race for thousands of years.

Let people speak. Let the community decide what is true and worth listening to. We have both downvotes and deport buttons. The community can decide for itself. We don't need censoring overlords.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– deleted 7 points 3 years ago +10 / -3

▲ -1 ▼

– Slyver -1 points 3 years ago +3 / -4

The number of false equivalences and strawmen in your "argument" is truly astonishing. I am sincerely impressed.

The only thing that had anything to do with what I said was:

This is a CURATED FORUM

To which I fully agree (no argument from me). However, I reply with my first reply:

I'm not suggesting there be no moderation. There are enemies afoot, but moderation should always err on the side of not censoring than the other way around.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q