Really free society isn't free from "opression" (or rather some morons feeling oppressed) - cannot be,but not allows also purposeful acts of pure oppressing somebody without reason and justification.
I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)
Your freedom ends where my/somebody's other nose begins.
Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".
it is more definite
it is clear example
not allows so much sophistic philosophic debate "is that harm or not" with isolation of this debate purpose, which is stealing freedoms of somebody other.
Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.
People which question and blur basic conceptions of culture and try to change words meaning to blur words (read 1984 - especially things about double-speak) are no better than mass murderers and those child raping monsters - because they guarantee them impunity and lack of punishment from the masses by blinding people and blunting morality of the society.
I agree with you. I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. It is still a right in my opinion. If facebook and twitter can ban anyone they want because "they are 'private' businesses" Then a cake shop does not HAVE to bake a cake for someone they disagree with. These people are stupid. Logic has been lost.
I want a free society where I am free to oppress whomever I want /s
a truly free society doesn't do oppression, it does tolerance and recognises that freedom is applied equally to anyone and everyone.
simple rule: "Do no harm" should be applicable, use your freedoms as you wish but not in any way that causes somebody else a problem.
It's called responsibility.
Your "Do no harm" offends my sensibilities
ok blueanon, got your message.
Well... u/bubble_bursts and u/Fringe--dweller : both of you are wrong.
Really free society isn't free from "opression" (or rather some morons feeling oppressed) - cannot be,but not allows also purposeful acts of pure oppressing somebody without reason and justification.
u/Frindge--dweller:
So also allows satanist paedophiles to rape and eat the children if they only want to? What with those children freedom and their life ?
Leave alone those black person who did nothing to you or your ass will be kicked so strong you will not need rocket to get to the moon !
what part of "do no harm" don't you understand.
You are being decisive with your straw man bull.
Be free but do no harm to others, be responsible with your freedoms - is the message that I sent.
I understand perfectly. The problem is with those who ignore it or try to "prove" they are doing no harm while they are doing harm... - it is problem with current so called "liberalism" (marxism under disguise of liberalism)
Is much better Than blah blah "free of oppression" but blah blah "do no harm".
Because there are people who want to move your nose or ignore it to have more freedom (and use it for wrongdoing) at the cost of our freedom.
People which question and blur basic conceptions of culture and try to change words meaning to blur words (read 1984 - especially things about double-speak) are no better than mass murderers and those child raping monsters - because they guarantee them impunity and lack of punishment from the masses by blinding people and blunting morality of the society.
I agree with you. I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone. It is still a right in my opinion. If facebook and twitter can ban anyone they want because "they are 'private' businesses" Then a cake shop does not HAVE to bake a cake for someone they disagree with. These people are stupid. Logic has been lost.