Nice try.
There’s plenty of video and eyewitness testimony of molten steel running out of the towers. Normally those are temps only achievable in a foundry,
The fires under WTC burned for MONTHS even in freezing ambient temps.
The BYU professor who examined the dust found microspheres which could only be created by nanothermitic reactions.
Is there any evidence of burns or other intense heat related trauma associated with the survivors directly exposed to the dust at the time of the event?
people covered in dust This image, and others like it appear to show people covered in dust at the time of the event. At such high temperatures that thermite combusts, would there be some serious burns and breathing problems?
The samples they found in the dust were unreacted microscopic samples. Not a chemist but my impression is that they were inert remnants that wouldn’t have burned anyone.
Nanospheres form during the cooling process and since they have so little surface area they cool very quickly. Breathing problems were certainly reported though.
No. Jet fuel is about as hot as kerosene. Steel requires temps above ~1400C to get to a molten state.
Most of the fuel burned off in a couple minutes after the initial fireball. Let’s pretend the fuel was hot enough. Do you really believe there was enough volume of fuel to completely melt all of the massive internal vertical support columns, the steel exterior of the building AND pulverize all of the concrete into dust?
The way your comment is worded implies that the only source of combustion and heat was the jet fuel, which is patently false. The buildings were literally filled with combustible materials.
Not. Avjet is a kerosene/diesel range petroleum distillate & it’s low scale fumes are barely combustible. I’ve seen guys throw cigarettes into buckets of Avjet & they just extinguish.
Nice try. There’s plenty of video and eyewitness testimony of molten steel running out of the towers. Normally those are temps only achievable in a foundry, The fires under WTC burned for MONTHS even in freezing ambient temps. The BYU professor who examined the dust found microspheres which could only be created by nanothermitic reactions.
Is there any evidence of burns or other intense heat related trauma associated with the survivors directly exposed to the dust at the time of the event?
From the unreacted thermite? I don’t know.
people covered in dust This image, and others like it appear to show people covered in dust at the time of the event. At such high temperatures that thermite combusts, would there be some serious burns and breathing problems?
The samples they found in the dust were unreacted microscopic samples. Not a chemist but my impression is that they were inert remnants that wouldn’t have burned anyone.
Nanospheres form during the cooling process and since they have so little surface area they cool very quickly. Breathing problems were certainly reported though.
Jet fuel is hot
No. Jet fuel is about as hot as kerosene. Steel requires temps above ~1400C to get to a molten state.
Most of the fuel burned off in a couple minutes after the initial fireball. Let’s pretend the fuel was hot enough. Do you really believe there was enough volume of fuel to completely melt all of the massive internal vertical support columns, the steel exterior of the building AND pulverize all of the concrete into dust?
You light an office building that big on fire with an airplane ,dont say it dodnt couse I watched it,and steel is going to melt.
The way your comment is worded implies that the only source of combustion and heat was the jet fuel, which is patently false. The buildings were literally filled with combustible materials.
Not. Avjet is a kerosene/diesel range petroleum distillate & it’s low scale fumes are barely combustible. I’ve seen guys throw cigarettes into buckets of Avjet & they just extinguish.
I have vaporized steel with propane too.