Thermite is typically used as an incendiary. "Most varieties are not explosive, but can create brief bursts of heat and high temperature in a small area." -wiki
Directed Energy Weapons exist. Could those have been used?
Nanothermite is an exotic material engineered at the atom scale at Lawrence Livermore and Sandia Labs for military applications. That’s what was found in the dust samples from WTC.
Sorry but NIST told us that building 7 fell due to an intense fire which apparently got so hot it softened and buckled the steel supports which in turn led to the collapse of building 7 into its own footprint (although a recent study concludes the NIST report as nonsense) and yet when the archetects asked NIST for their findings, because as designers if there was a fatal flaw in the design that can bring a high rise structure down due to some small office fires, NIST refused and locked away the study so nobody could rectify the supposed problem? Ehhh?
Think Bessemer Effect, the 19th Century steel refining system to use coke and forced air to melt and refine steel. Now think a 1,000 foot column of air forced into blown out floors where fuel and furniture were burning intensely... Physics takes into account odd anomalies that occur. I have always conceded #7 was too damned convenient, but the towers themselves were designed to take a hit from a 707 @ 150 MPH with little fuel, NOT a fully fueled 757 @ 500 MPH. Until an official source comes out with facts and truth, I will stand by physics.
Thermite is typically used as an incendiary. "Most varieties are not explosive, but can create brief bursts of heat and high temperature in a small area." -wiki Directed Energy Weapons exist. Could those have been used?
Nanothermite is an exotic material engineered at the atom scale at Lawrence Livermore and Sandia Labs for military applications. That’s what was found in the dust samples from WTC.
There is little evidence of high heat being involved in the destruction of the WTC.
Sorry but NIST told us that building 7 fell due to an intense fire which apparently got so hot it softened and buckled the steel supports which in turn led to the collapse of building 7 into its own footprint (although a recent study concludes the NIST report as nonsense) and yet when the archetects asked NIST for their findings, because as designers if there was a fatal flaw in the design that can bring a high rise structure down due to some small office fires, NIST refused and locked away the study so nobody could rectify the supposed problem? Ehhh?
Think Bessemer Effect, the 19th Century steel refining system to use coke and forced air to melt and refine steel. Now think a 1,000 foot column of air forced into blown out floors where fuel and furniture were burning intensely... Physics takes into account odd anomalies that occur. I have always conceded #7 was too damned convenient, but the towers themselves were designed to take a hit from a 707 @ 150 MPH with little fuel, NOT a fully fueled 757 @ 500 MPH. Until an official source comes out with facts and truth, I will stand by physics.
At that, have at it, boys...