Yes, she’s one of the “so few”. Imagine how amazing our entire society-and the world - would be right now if we’d had people of this caliber in leadership roles all along. SMH
That point being if the citizenry votes in a way that she doesn’t approve, then she will use taxpayer money to launch a legal campaign to nullify the amendment to the constitution that was lawfully instated by ballot initiative.
Like she has done with the recreational legalization of cannabis. She even found a judge that agreed with her paper thin technicality.
She is overriding the legitimate will of the people of her state.
Yes, she’s one of the “so few”. Imagine how amazing our entire society-and the world - would be right now if we’d had people of this caliber in leadership roles all along. SMH
Yeah, she’s good. Up to a point.
That point being if the citizenry votes in a way that she doesn’t approve, then she will use taxpayer money to launch a legal campaign to nullify the amendment to the constitution that was lawfully instated by ballot initiative.
Like she has done with the recreational legalization of cannabis. She even found a judge that agreed with her paper thin technicality.
She is overriding the legitimate will of the people of her state.
It is it’s own brand of tyrannical.