those complaining about citizenjournalist
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (194)
sorted by:
If that is the case, how did they masterfully place the tree branches in front and above the building? This tree is not in front of the real White House.
The photo is real, just not the real White House.
I dunno about your house, but here in winter, trees have leaves that fall off them.
It is not about the leaves. It is about erasing the top part of the White House as you said. It is extremely difficult to do that without messing up the tree branches or the background replaced behind them. You would have to go pixel by pixel to remove and replace the background. Even then it would not be perfect unless there are better Paint programs that would make it seamless.
That being said, the "rub marks" could be natural weathering on this building.
All I did was put the red circles around the parts of the top that they tried to make look like they were different.. Sorry, IMO its the same.
They are arguing about the second floor missing... They can't comprehend that the camera angles are at play. So I drew this for them.
https://i.maga.host/M6mJZjn.png
Leaves don't matter because the pictures were taken at different times of the year.
the trees look to be the same in both pics.
I'm referring to the background behind the tree. If the photo was messed with, the tree branches would not look right.
its the exact same tree because its the exact same building