What is the validity of this claim? Seems like a stretch
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (146)
sorted by:
Your evidence of suspicion still appears to me to be that Matt Crouch is citing himself. Are you suggesting some OTHER reason to be suspicious?
I am not in any way saying I believe Matt Crouch. He doesn't provide source links. I am not a fan of that. He says in his tweet that DJT will sign the new checks, but his article says something else. THIS is evidence of untrustworthyness, but I don't see you saying that anywhere. You only made statements of him citing himself, or bad editing, or other things that I consider to be non-evidence of suspicion. At this point I am more likely to trust sources with bad site editing than those that look professional (though in truth I trust no one).
Regarding my first statement: I responded stating that there is nothing suspect in linking to yourself. I stand by that response.
Reasons to be suspicious
As said, your statement of there is nothing suspect linking yourself is a hollow statement. It doesn't need to be said and I never said there was anything wrong with it. There was never a need for you to stand by it. That's why you dig, to find out if it floats or not.
Although given what I have presented overall I'm eager to learn more about this all not seeming like he suspiciously talks bullshit that you propose. Take your time.
Well done, thank you kindly.
'Matt Couch' ( you misspelled his name) has no legitimate press credentials'
so who is this 'legitimate press' you speak of?
Indeed, I misspelled his name.
And really, after all that, you think one paltry question somehow throws a spanner in the works? That's it? That's your checkmate?
You might have heard a rumour I'm starting a sportsbook. If you're happy to bet on your lame horse I'm willing to pay you at a rate of 10:1 if he crosses the finish line. No refunds on your highly likely loss - store policy.
no, if I was trying for a 'checkmate', it was; you thinking there are some kind of 'press credentials' that would make him more trustworthy...you didn't answer why that matters?
Plenty of sources reported on it. The news article was stickied here a few days ago in fact. https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/09/politics/joe-biden-stimulus-payments-signature/index.html
That article only says that Biden’s name won’t be on them.
Matt Couch is making the claim Trump’s name will be.
Those aren’t the same thing.
This right here. It was so fucking weird to see how many comments were like "YEAH TRUMPS GONNA BE ON THE SIG LINE" when those posts came out that were just stating Xiden's wouldn't be. It feels like shilly bait for gullible fools. Remember what we learned about news framing and pushing us towards our assumptions to make us look like fools. Nothing wrong with being hopeful real POTUS is still in charge but lets not fall for red herrings and half baked bait. We look stupid enough as it is due to generations of intentional programming by the elites by simply knowing how thin the veil is. Stay vigilant and don't let your biases cloud your judgement.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/09/politics/joe-biden-stimulus-payments-signature/index.html
Good to see another person with a head for critical thinking.
It's almost like people don't even bother reading the articles they promote. The hype train leaves the station but nobody bothers to check the destination.
Dumb lemmings that will follow any fool who waves a flag, talks about prayer, and clucks about patriotism. Just because a person speaks of traits and passions that stir your own heart doesn't mean they aren't still full of shit.
So many claim to know the lefts tactics yet can't see false flag propaganda when it is right under their noses.
Does Matt's website have links that want to talk about your health? And sell you China-made supplements packaged in the USA?