Ohh. They clarified that further on in that column by YOUTUBE LIVE TV, who is the second member of "Team George" (who according to GEORGEnews are four in number):
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: We said yes to a different question that was asked...
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: "Are there still people fighting behind the scenes?" That part of the question.
No, I don't believe it relates to Q at all. It relates instead to imposter channels and actual paytriots, and how to identify them. See also here (Chat Line for 3/03/2021, Upper-left):
If we take them at their word, being partners with State/DoD and having "full access to their AVOCs and Circuit IDs via Verizon" would bypass DVIDS.
DVIDS is a distribution service for the DoD and is not the licensor of these materials. The licensor and producer of the materials is the DoD. Basically, if what is said is true DoD is giving direct access for the visual information to George News. It would be like a manufacturer bypassing the wholesaler to supply the retailer directly.
But I suppose you think what they say is false. Fair enough, but just be clear on the fact that DVIDS is a distributor on behalf of the DoD and not a licensor or producer of these materials.
And Paper.li is just a Content Management Service, they only provide web templates. The guys that run George News are likely not IT specialists or web developers, so they get ready-made templates for them to build their site with.
No, I understood that joke but didn't agree with it. I don't distrust people based on false assumptions. I already explained my stance in this post here.
Thank you so much! The only disheartening question they answered was yes to “do we wait 2-4 more years?” However there were several other questions in front of that one. This is an excellent breakdown! Again thank you for the time spent!
>EchoLight @GEORGEnews @YOUTUBE LIVE TV Right now are all 4 on the chat or only you 2?
>YOUTUE LIVE TV: ...2
This was in response to this message:
>GEORGEnews: Among a team of four, we do travel internationally.. sometimes on public flights too.
Problem is that most people thought it answered something else: "Do we wait 2-4 years?", "is there a double meaning between vaccine and Project and Operation Warp Speed?" because Team George didn't frame their answer.
EDIT: They clarified that further on in that column by YOUTUBE LIVE TV, who is the second member of "Team George" (who according to GEORGEnews are four in number):
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: We said yes to a different question that was asked...
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: Are there still people fighting behind the scenes?" That part of the question.
Ohh. They clarified that further on in that column by YOUTUBE LIVE TV, who is the second member of "Team George" (who according to GEORGEnews are four in number):
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: We said yes to a different question that was asked...
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: Are there still people fighting behind the scenes?" That part of the question.
2-4 years??!! Man, I hope that's wrong, but some interesting insights there.
Huh, where are you getting 2-4 years from (which column)?
Second column, about half-way down.
Read it again, look who he is replying to, it's not the gal asking the 2022 question, it's the one above her.
Yes I got that, but it's sort of the same question. "Waiting 2-4 years?"
No, I can see now what's the confusion. I should have highlighted the whole exchange that followed.
In fact it's such a critical mistake I might have to repost the compilation.
Ohh. They clarified that further on in that column by YOUTUBE LIVE TV, who is the second member of "Team George" (who according to GEORGEnews are four in number):
I missed that... can you point me to the column and approximate location down the page?
Oh wait... think I see it. They are answering the "people behind the scene" question, NOT the 2-4 years question!! Thanks, got it.
Thanks for pointing out the misunderstanding, I've reposted it accordingly:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkrCxh16/live-chat-compilation-for-sat-13/c/
Excellent recovery... these are important distinctions, and it lifts me up quite a bit to see that the plan is still in play.
Thank you for this.
Repost: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkrCxh16/live-chat-compilation-for-sat-13/c/
is their comment in the 2nd column with the 28:15 time stamp adversarial toward Q or supportive?
No, I don't believe it relates to Q at all. It relates instead to imposter channels and actual paytriots, and how to identify them. See also here (Chat Line for 3/03/2021, Upper-left):
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkr8RTiD/chat-from-georgenews-for-the-fir/c/
GN are also completely supportive of Q.
Sorry, I had to repost: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkrCxh16/live-chat-compilation-for-sat-13/
Could you post your comment here?
If we take them at their word, being partners with State/DoD and having "full access to their AVOCs and Circuit IDs via Verizon" would bypass DVIDS.
DVIDS is a distribution service for the DoD and is not the licensor of these materials. The licensor and producer of the materials is the DoD. Basically, if what is said is true DoD is giving direct access for the visual information to George News. It would be like a manufacturer bypassing the wholesaler to supply the retailer directly.
But I suppose you think what they say is false. Fair enough, but just be clear on the fact that DVIDS is a distributor on behalf of the DoD and not a licensor or producer of these materials.
There's no pleasing you, is there?
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkmV9Dgh/thoughts-on-the-ovhcloud-fire-as/
This comment explains it best, I beleive:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkmV9Dgh/x/c/4DyMa2wEilo
And Paper.li is just a Content Management Service, they only provide web templates. The guys that run George News are likely not IT specialists or web developers, so they get ready-made templates for them to build their site with.
No, I understood that joke but didn't agree with it. I don't distrust people based on false assumptions. I already explained my stance in this post here.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkmZiBHO/if-im-going-to-keep-posting-geor/
I love how you are an attorney and know what the fuck you are talking about.
Deleting this for now, need to clarify links between Qs and As
Thank you so much! The only disheartening question they answered was yes to “do we wait 2-4 more years?” However there were several other questions in front of that one. This is an excellent breakdown! Again thank you for the time spent!
No, that answer was for my question (3rd column):>EchoLight @GEORGEnews @YOUTUBE LIVE TV Right now are all 4 on the chat or only you 2?>YOUTUE LIVE TV: ...2This was in response to this message:>GEORGEnews: Among a team of four, we do travel internationally.. sometimes on public flights too.Problem is that most people thought it answered something else: "Do we wait 2-4 years?", "is there a double meaning between vaccine and Project and Operation Warp Speed?" because Team George didn't frame their answer.EDIT: They clarified that further on in that column by YOUTUBE LIVE TV, who is the second member of "Team George" (who according to GEORGEnews are four in number):
Thanks for the compliment though!
The question was from Kelly Hutchinson “do we wait another 2-4 years and George stayed “Kelly Hutchinson- yes”
She asked 3 different questions in the same thread, how do you know which question was being answered?
Yes I stated that in my initial response
Repost for clarity:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkrCxh16/live-chat-compilation-for-sat-13/c/
Repost for clarity: https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkrCxh16/live-chat-compilation-for-sat-13/c/
Ohh. They clarified that further on in that column by YOUTUBE LIVE TV, who is the second member of "Team George" (who according to GEORGEnews are four in number):
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: We said yes to a different question that was asked...
YOUTUBE LIVE TV: Are there still people fighting behind the scenes?" That part of the question.
Thank you!