From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples , but rather were made using an algorithmic method, where the dna sample is compared against a computer database of other sequences and then the computer statistically interpolates the missing genetic material. The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples
Do you have any evidence to support this assertion?
The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
And this. Every piece of evidence I have looked into has proven to not be credible and/or the evidence does not pass the sniff test.
As someone who works in the field, I can smell fear-mongering bullshit or even just plain ignorance on a very complicated topic (cell and molecular biology and/or genetics) a mile away. Everything I have seen on this (so far) falls into one of those two categories. It is my current belief that statements of the sort you are citing have been purposeful disinformation (not from you, but from the original sources).
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples , but rather were made using an algorithmic method, where the dna sample is compared against a computer database of other sequences and then the computer statistically interpolates the missing genetic material. The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
Do you have any evidence to support this assertion?
And this. Every piece of evidence I have looked into has proven to not be credible and/or the evidence does not pass the sniff test.
As someone who works in the field, I can smell fear-mongering bullshit or even just plain ignorance on a very complicated topic (cell and molecular biology and/or genetics) a mile away. Everything I have seen on this (so far) falls into one of those two categories. It is my current belief that statements of the sort you are citing have been purposeful disinformation (not from you, but from the original sources).