Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples , but rather were made using an algorithmic method, where the dna sample is compared against a computer database of other sequences and then the computer statistically interpolates the missing genetic material. The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples
Do you have any evidence to support this assertion?
The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
And this. Every piece of evidence I have looked into has proven to not be credible and/or the evidence does not pass the sniff test.
As someone who works in the field, I can smell fear-mongering bullshit or even just plain ignorance on a very complicated topic (cell and molecular biology and/or genetics) a mile away. Everything I have seen on this (so far) falls into one of those two categories. It is my current belief that statements of the sort you are citing have been purposeful disinformation (not from you, but from the original sources).
Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
For example:
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
From what I know, the DNA sequences were never taken from isolated virus samples , but rather were made using an algorithmic method, where the dna sample is compared against a computer database of other sequences and then the computer statistically interpolates the missing genetic material. The problem that there was never a fully sequenced isolate, the ‘Covid’ sequence is basically a fancy computer model
Do you have any evidence to support this assertion?
And this. Every piece of evidence I have looked into has proven to not be credible and/or the evidence does not pass the sniff test.
As someone who works in the field, I can smell fear-mongering bullshit or even just plain ignorance on a very complicated topic (cell and molecular biology and/or genetics) a mile away. Everything I have seen on this (so far) falls into one of those two categories. It is my current belief that statements of the sort you are citing have been purposeful disinformation (not from you, but from the original sources).