Thank you for taking the time to read what I wrote. It is good to know that people are not so bound up in their own beliefs of fear that they are willing to look at evidence that runs contrary. It is wonderful that instead of making blanket claims of "Fake News" or "shooting the messenger" people are willing to think about another persons argument and then provide well thought out and researched counter evidence to promote the discussion and come closer to the truth, whatever that may be.
Logic is sound too! It makes more sense that they would post real experiments that most average citizens wouldn't take the time to look into much less be able to comprehend to a degree high enough to see behind their false narratives put forth in the media
Than it would be for them to put the time and energy to conduct a second false experiment with false findings, for every true experiment done, and to publish those false ones to the public while keeping the original true versions logged separately only for private eyes.
I mean I guess it would be possible, but I think once they felt a certain degree of comfort in being able to steer narratives, they would be inclined to not need to put in all the extra work and just lie instead.
Exactly. Hiding evidence doesn't really require hiding it, It takes so much less effort to motivate people to not want to look at it or speak out when they see it ("conspiracy theorist" e.g.).
Thank you for taking the time to read what I wrote. It is good to know that people are not so bound up in their own beliefs of fear that they are willing to look at evidence that runs contrary. It is wonderful that instead of making blanket claims of "Fake News" or "shooting the messenger" people are willing to think about another persons argument and then provide well thought out and researched counter evidence to promote the discussion and come closer to the truth, whatever that may be.
/s
I can appreciate your scholarly asf work there.
Logic is sound too! It makes more sense that they would post real experiments that most average citizens wouldn't take the time to look into much less be able to comprehend to a degree high enough to see behind their false narratives put forth in the media
Than it would be for them to put the time and energy to conduct a second false experiment with false findings, for every true experiment done, and to publish those false ones to the public while keeping the original true versions logged separately only for private eyes.
I mean I guess it would be possible, but I think once they felt a certain degree of comfort in being able to steer narratives, they would be inclined to not need to put in all the extra work and just lie instead.
Exactly. Hiding evidence doesn't really require hiding it, It takes so much less effort to motivate people to not want to look at it or speak out when they see it ("conspiracy theorist" e.g.).
Logic is sound. Now let's high five and remark upon how shocked we are that the other guy got so easily lost in translation lol.
word
Aw cmon don't be gei