Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
Here is a link to a database where sars-cov-2 variants from all over the world were submitted from independent tests that can be compared and studied.
Here is an early analysis of the virus that suggests it was designed in a lab.
Here is another analysis that suggests the reason it is so contagious is because its cell surface binding proteins were modeled after the same proteins used by the HIV virus. Something that is almost impossible to have happened naturally. This particular paper was forced to be retracted by the PTB, almost certainly to force people to not look deeper into this line of reasoning.
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
Well first...not one comment have i stated support or trust for anyone, either side..
I get your point, and the other person's comments..but the guy in video is stating exactly the same points we all know and agree on..but many calling him wrong because a few cannot "source" him? Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements? Some here shooting the messenger, even though we agree with his info..thats fine..you guys are missing the point...
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies..but suddenly here their info is being defended..
makes no sense..
I mostly only trust God and myself..but thanks for suggesting whom i Should trust
I'm a researcher in biology and nanotechnology. I neither "know" nor "agree" with anything this man said. Not because I don't want to, but because I looked quite hard and found no credible sources to corroborate. In addition, when checking out THIS person, I found zero credibility in his testimony or even evidence of his existence at all.
Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements
He was not factually correct in ANY of his statements that I could find, and I looked very, very hard. He didn't even say everything correctly about the biology. This makes me very suspect, although cell biology is very complicated. Even those with knowledge make mistakes in the details sometimes.
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies
The people at the top of these organizations are almost certainly our enemies, but the vast majority of people that work at, for, or with these organizations are not. Some are brainwashed, some are not. A very good friend of mine works for the FDA and she is based as fuck. But that is not how science is done. It doesn't matter what a person says, it matters what the SCIENCE says.
Anyone with sufficient knowledge can go into their data and see the problems with it. A scientist can lie, and they can try to use science to do it, but science cannot lie. Anyone with knowledge can see the problems with any published science because the problems are there, usually in plain sight, for anyone to see.
I have used the data from the CDC to red-pill other scientists. To think we can't use their data or experiments published on their site is idiotic, or more specifically, ignorant.
I do not recommend you trust the CDC. I don't trust them one iota. But I know what I read in the experiments and papers, the source is irrelevant. If it smells like bullshit, its bullshit, no matter the source. This guy smells like bullshit. Its just the truth of it from someone with experience in this specific field.
I welcome any other evidence to support the claims this person makes. My mind is never made up, but on this guy, without anything else to corroborate, and with what I know (biology), I am giving this a very high probability of being purposeful disinformation to make people with real knowledge, stating real problems with the vaccine and the scamdemic look like "conspiracy theorists."
Looking up this person, Dr. Derek Knauss (or Derick Knauss) gives me absolutely nothing except links to websites posting this story in one form or another. Looking up Dereck/Derick Knauss on a people finder produced zero results in CA (he said he works in Southern CA). Looking him up on scholar.google.com also provides nothing. Zero, zilch, nada, which is basically impossible if he is in fact a Ph.D.
There is NO evidence that this person exists or does the job he says he does, therefore this person is not a source of credible information.
The virus existing has substantial credible evidence however. That does not mean it does exist. It most certainly does not mean it is as deadly as reported. It does not mean anything other than that in doing research on it, I find credible evidence of its existence.
For example:
There is much, much more evidence that it has been isolated and tested. Please note I am not saying that the deaths attributed to Covid-19 are accurate (or even close, or even any at all). I am not saying anything about this scamdemic (in this post) OTHER than that the sars-cov-2 has been isolated and is a real virus.
If anyone can provide evidence that these are untrue assertions I will be more than happy to look into it.
Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
Well first...not one comment have i stated support or trust for anyone, either side.. I get your point, and the other person's comments..but the guy in video is stating exactly the same points we all know and agree on..but many calling him wrong because a few cannot "source" him? Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements? Some here shooting the messenger, even though we agree with his info..thats fine..you guys are missing the point...
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies..but suddenly here their info is being defended.. makes no sense.. I mostly only trust God and myself..but thanks for suggesting whom i Should trust
I'm a researcher in biology and nanotechnology. I neither "know" nor "agree" with anything this man said. Not because I don't want to, but because I looked quite hard and found no credible sources to corroborate. In addition, when checking out THIS person, I found zero credibility in his testimony or even evidence of his existence at all.
He was not factually correct in ANY of his statements that I could find, and I looked very, very hard. He didn't even say everything correctly about the biology. This makes me very suspect, although cell biology is very complicated. Even those with knowledge make mistakes in the details sometimes.
The people at the top of these organizations are almost certainly our enemies, but the vast majority of people that work at, for, or with these organizations are not. Some are brainwashed, some are not. A very good friend of mine works for the FDA and she is based as fuck. But that is not how science is done. It doesn't matter what a person says, it matters what the SCIENCE says.
Anyone with sufficient knowledge can go into their data and see the problems with it. A scientist can lie, and they can try to use science to do it, but science cannot lie. Anyone with knowledge can see the problems with any published science because the problems are there, usually in plain sight, for anyone to see.
I have used the data from the CDC to red-pill other scientists. To think we can't use their data or experiments published on their site is idiotic, or more specifically, ignorant.
I do not recommend you trust the CDC. I don't trust them one iota. But I know what I read in the experiments and papers, the source is irrelevant. If it smells like bullshit, its bullshit, no matter the source. This guy smells like bullshit. Its just the truth of it from someone with experience in this specific field.
I welcome any other evidence to support the claims this person makes. My mind is never made up, but on this guy, without anything else to corroborate, and with what I know (biology), I am giving this a very high probability of being purposeful disinformation to make people with real knowledge, stating real problems with the vaccine and the scamdemic look like "conspiracy theorists."