Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
Yes. I agree. What Slyver mentioned, concerning this patented virus, was everything that we were told from the beginning. We were told that it had HIV, came from WUHAN, was extremely virulent, and de novo. The only thing is, the researchers that had "supposedly" isolated the COV-2 novel virus, were all disingenuous with a motive to keep America locked down and in fear. Many virologists/scientists have been killed and silenced, that had evidence otherwise.
What would constitute proof? Pictures? They exist, but could be made up, or from a different coronavirus. DNA? I've provided several sources for that (if you took the time to look instead of dismissing out of hand). Tests on the virus itself? I provided links to that as well and can provide hundreds more.
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean? What constitutes a case? People have been tested when not even being sick. Why? Is it even contagious? Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world, wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance, and cause extreme psychological fear and long term damage? I'm not shooting the messenger. I'm just thinking...We are surrounded by so many microorganisms all day, constantly... What is the point of terrorizing people, spending tons of money on studying, testing, etc. It's a virus that isn't even deadly. There are so many other viruses and diseases that are way more deadly. Anyway, just my thoughts.
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean?
It means that information that it doesn't exist at all is disinformation. I think such provably false "information" is intended to make those looking into it look bad, make them look like "conspiracy theorists" as this guy looks like. It gives the people pushing a false narrative fuel to discredit those who say negative things about the narrative.
What constitutes a case?
There are symptoms that have been discussed that match previous SARS cases. This virus seems to attack a certain type of cell that expresses the ACE 2 protein (notably specific cardiopulmonary cells), and I think cells in the nose and throat as well (I'd have to look that up).
People have been tested when not even being sick. Why?
The type of test used (PCR) is being used fraudulently (too many cycles). The test itself is already only useful in certain situations, but for a test of this type it is almost useless even in the best of cases. But much worse than that, the protocol that was pushed by the WHO (at nearly twice as many cycles as standard PCR) was guaranteed to produce many, many false positives.
Using the test in this manner can only be for one reason: to falsely get the numbers up, to push fear through the population, to force draconian responses, and to make the population subservient to their fear and those political and health department leaders that were "trying to help them". There is no other logical reason they would have used the PCR test in such an obviously incorrect manner, and every single research biologist in the world who has ever done PCR knows it, which is basically all of them.
Is it even contagious?
I think it may be very contagious. I think it was modified to be very contagious. I haven't looked into its actual biology as much as I should have. I have been concerned with other aspects of it. Once I realized it was not very deadly these types of effects became less of a concern for me.
Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world
Most definitely not. Its a bad cold. Before we had good therapeutics it may have been a problem, but just vitamin D and zinc are likely sufficient to prevent serious harm in all but those who were very ill before encountering the virus. HCQ and zinc do seem to be excellent if taken even in those with comorbidities if taken before serious damage is done.
wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance
Wearing cloth masks is useless to prevent the spread of the virus. Wearing masks of any type without constantly replacing them with sterile ones does more harm than good. Constant sanitation reduces the strength of our immune system, making us more likely to get seriously ill or die if we do encounter the virus (or any infection). Socially distancing may or may not help stop the spread, but we don't actually want to stop the spread. THEY want to stop the spread so they can keep us living in fear longer.
We live in fear because they are programming us, and for no other reason. I believe that SARS-cov-2 is a real virus, and I believe it gets people sick. I believe it has killed some people, but almost all of them were sick with other things first (cancer, diabetes, etc.). The evidence also suggests that HCQ and zinc, maybe an antibiotic as therapeutics, if you do get sick, are likely enough to prevent serious damage from this virus (if done before it gets bad). Not one other thing seems to be necessary.
All evidence I have seen, doing probably thousands of hours of research suggests the worlds overreaction to SARS-cov-2 is a scam designed to take us into their "Great Reset" aka the NWO.
If you looked you would see that I have three independent sources. The first two sources are the CDC (which is what I think you are referring to) and if you were to actually look at them (and you had sufficient knowledge to understand the information (which is non-trivial)) you would know that these CDC sources, when you really dig in, destroy their own narrative.
The third link I provided happens to link to a site that is related to the CDC, but that is only because pubmed links to pretty much every peer reviewed paper. You can find the paper on many sites that have nothing to do with the CDC.
The 4th and 5th links go to researchgate. This means they have not yet passed peer review. Researchgate has nothing to do with the CDC. In fact, it is the place to most likely find real science that refutes the CDC.
I DID look at your sources...all have been caught in a lie.
I failed to see the lab that Has the Virus Isolated be mentioned....?
If not isolated, cant create vaccine...
Say and link whatever you want. This is Planned-demic...not even sure what you're trying to prove anymore.
My point is that using links from lying organizations with that are profiting from lying...seems odd and disingenuous...but feel free..im moving on.
The CDC links (at least the second one) prove that the whole virus narrative is false (if you know how to look at the information). If nothing else, this proves that not everything at the CDC promotes the "covid-19" narrative. On the contrary, most of the data does the opposite. They expect people to not look, and those that do look they expect to be too afraid to say anything, or be discredited by those of their peers who are.
As for the peer reviewed paper I linked, it is a peer reviewed paper. You can find it on literally every single publisher of peer reviewed papers. Here are a few non-CDC links:
I can list a hundred more if you want. Its a peer reviewed paper. This is just how it works. It goes to all peer reviewed journals.
If you want to talk about how all peer reviewed science is suspect, that's another topic. It would be one that every scientist in the world agrees with, and has through all of time. In fact, that is how science works.
What it is however, is credible evidence. To refute scientific evidence requires refuting the arguments and analyses within the work. It never works to just say "your source is not credible because I don't like them." That is the opposite of debate.
That is called an ad hominem attack. It is a weak tactic by those that have no actual counter arguments. You can only provide a counter argument in a scientific debate by understanding and cogitating on the original arguments.
Your attacks on the researchgate papers are completely not credible, and you obviously have NO IDEA what researchgate is. It is literally the best place to find real science in a world trying to hide evidence.
I failed to see the lab that Has the Virus Isolated be mentioned
How many more would you like? I can do this all day (although I won't).
I am not saying these are all credible sources. I have not vetted them. I looked at the first one, and as someone who has performed similar experiments it looks completely legit at first glance.
But if I were to say these specific labs stating explicitly that they have isolated the virus are lying I would have to read each one in detail and find evidence of the lies. If I were to just make the claim they are lying because I don't like them I would become a non-credible source of information myself.
Well first...not one comment have i stated support or trust for anyone, either side..
I get your point, and the other person's comments..but the guy in video is stating exactly the same points we all know and agree on..but many calling him wrong because a few cannot "source" him? Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements? Some here shooting the messenger, even though we agree with his info..thats fine..you guys are missing the point...
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies..but suddenly here their info is being defended..
makes no sense..
I mostly only trust God and myself..but thanks for suggesting whom i Should trust
I'm a researcher in biology and nanotechnology. I neither "know" nor "agree" with anything this man said. Not because I don't want to, but because I looked quite hard and found no credible sources to corroborate. In addition, when checking out THIS person, I found zero credibility in his testimony or even evidence of his existence at all.
Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements
He was not factually correct in ANY of his statements that I could find, and I looked very, very hard. He didn't even say everything correctly about the biology. This makes me very suspect, although cell biology is very complicated. Even those with knowledge make mistakes in the details sometimes.
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies
The people at the top of these organizations are almost certainly our enemies, but the vast majority of people that work at, for, or with these organizations are not. Some are brainwashed, some are not. A very good friend of mine works for the FDA and she is based as fuck. But that is not how science is done. It doesn't matter what a person says, it matters what the SCIENCE says.
Anyone with sufficient knowledge can go into their data and see the problems with it. A scientist can lie, and they can try to use science to do it, but science cannot lie. Anyone with knowledge can see the problems with any published science because the problems are there, usually in plain sight, for anyone to see.
I have used the data from the CDC to red-pill other scientists. To think we can't use their data or experiments published on their site is idiotic, or more specifically, ignorant.
I do not recommend you trust the CDC. I don't trust them one iota. But I know what I read in the experiments and papers, the source is irrelevant. If it smells like bullshit, its bullshit, no matter the source. This guy smells like bullshit. Its just the truth of it from someone with experience in this specific field.
I welcome any other evidence to support the claims this person makes. My mind is never made up, but on this guy, without anything else to corroborate, and with what I know (biology), I am giving this a very high probability of being purposeful disinformation to make people with real knowledge, stating real problems with the vaccine and the scamdemic look like "conspiracy theorists."
You're So right...Everything you have typed...I was wrong to think i could match your wits.Forgive me typing-ill of the CDC or any of your favorite research sites. I sure will think twice about repeating any of my "idiotic" or" ignorant" ideas next time.
Thanks for teaching me, and everyone that Covid-19 is Real and that its not actually just influenza strains in an altered state. Man glad we got that cleared up. Ill put my mask back on and shut up mr Fauci.
...just wow....you heard it here first folks...we got a RealVirus on our hands!!! Lol...And since i cant or wont source you and mr "smarter=than=anyone-else", by your own logic, i wont be trusting you either..Thanks for lining me out though. Lol
...And using CDC and NIH is no different...
Lets agree to disagree...
Sir you have only one source of info that we Know is fact, the HIV transmission sourse which we have known for a solid year now...ALL your sources arefrom organizations that we also KNow have been lying to us for a year now. Not sure your motives, but to use sources from known liars seems a bit disingenuous to try to disprove another. You seem to be part of the problem.
....And find me the lab, in the entire world, that will Show they actually have a covid-19 virus isolated within that lab....Ill wait...
Yes. I agree. What Slyver mentioned, concerning this patented virus, was everything that we were told from the beginning. We were told that it had HIV, came from WUHAN, was extremely virulent, and de novo. The only thing is, the researchers that had "supposedly" isolated the COV-2 novel virus, were all disingenuous with a motive to keep America locked down and in fear. Many virologists/scientists have been killed and silenced, that had evidence otherwise.
What would constitute proof? Pictures? They exist, but could be made up, or from a different coronavirus. DNA? I've provided several sources for that (if you took the time to look instead of dismissing out of hand). Tests on the virus itself? I provided links to that as well and can provide hundreds more.
What exactly would you like to see?
Even if the virus were to be isolated, what does it mean? What constitutes a case? People have been tested when not even being sick. Why? Is it even contagious? Does it mean it's virulent enough to lock down the world, wear cloth masks, use excessive sanitization techniques, socially distance, and cause extreme psychological fear and long term damage? I'm not shooting the messenger. I'm just thinking...We are surrounded by so many microorganisms all day, constantly... What is the point of terrorizing people, spending tons of money on studying, testing, etc. It's a virus that isn't even deadly. There are so many other viruses and diseases that are way more deadly. Anyway, just my thoughts.
It means that information that it doesn't exist at all is disinformation. I think such provably false "information" is intended to make those looking into it look bad, make them look like "conspiracy theorists" as this guy looks like. It gives the people pushing a false narrative fuel to discredit those who say negative things about the narrative.
There are symptoms that have been discussed that match previous SARS cases. This virus seems to attack a certain type of cell that expresses the ACE 2 protein (notably specific cardiopulmonary cells), and I think cells in the nose and throat as well (I'd have to look that up).
The type of test used (PCR) is being used fraudulently (too many cycles). The test itself is already only useful in certain situations, but for a test of this type it is almost useless even in the best of cases. But much worse than that, the protocol that was pushed by the WHO (at nearly twice as many cycles as standard PCR) was guaranteed to produce many, many false positives.
Using the test in this manner can only be for one reason: to falsely get the numbers up, to push fear through the population, to force draconian responses, and to make the population subservient to their fear and those political and health department leaders that were "trying to help them". There is no other logical reason they would have used the PCR test in such an obviously incorrect manner, and every single research biologist in the world who has ever done PCR knows it, which is basically all of them.
I think it may be very contagious. I think it was modified to be very contagious. I haven't looked into its actual biology as much as I should have. I have been concerned with other aspects of it. Once I realized it was not very deadly these types of effects became less of a concern for me.
Most definitely not. Its a bad cold. Before we had good therapeutics it may have been a problem, but just vitamin D and zinc are likely sufficient to prevent serious harm in all but those who were very ill before encountering the virus. HCQ and zinc do seem to be excellent if taken even in those with comorbidities if taken before serious damage is done.
Wearing cloth masks is useless to prevent the spread of the virus. Wearing masks of any type without constantly replacing them with sterile ones does more harm than good. Constant sanitation reduces the strength of our immune system, making us more likely to get seriously ill or die if we do encounter the virus (or any infection). Socially distancing may or may not help stop the spread, but we don't actually want to stop the spread. THEY want to stop the spread so they can keep us living in fear longer.
We live in fear because they are programming us, and for no other reason. I believe that SARS-cov-2 is a real virus, and I believe it gets people sick. I believe it has killed some people, but almost all of them were sick with other things first (cancer, diabetes, etc.). The evidence also suggests that HCQ and zinc, maybe an antibiotic as therapeutics, if you do get sick, are likely enough to prevent serious damage from this virus (if done before it gets bad). Not one other thing seems to be necessary.
All evidence I have seen, doing probably thousands of hours of research suggests the worlds overreaction to SARS-cov-2 is a scam designed to take us into their "Great Reset" aka the NWO.
A quote from someone who agrees with me. He doesn't have to exist.
If you looked you would see that I have three independent sources. The first two sources are the CDC (which is what I think you are referring to) and if you were to actually look at them (and you had sufficient knowledge to understand the information (which is non-trivial)) you would know that these CDC sources, when you really dig in, destroy their own narrative.
The third link I provided happens to link to a site that is related to the CDC, but that is only because pubmed links to pretty much every peer reviewed paper. You can find the paper on many sites that have nothing to do with the CDC.
The 4th and 5th links go to researchgate. This means they have not yet passed peer review. Researchgate has nothing to do with the CDC. In fact, it is the place to most likely find real science that refutes the CDC.
Check your statements before making accusations.
NIH=Fauci CDC=Fauci
I DID look at your sources...all have been caught in a lie. I failed to see the lab that Has the Virus Isolated be mentioned....? If not isolated, cant create vaccine... Say and link whatever you want. This is Planned-demic...not even sure what you're trying to prove anymore. My point is that using links from lying organizations with that are profiting from lying...seems odd and disingenuous...but feel free..im moving on.
But apparently did not listen to what I said.
The CDC links (at least the second one) prove that the whole virus narrative is false (if you know how to look at the information). If nothing else, this proves that not everything at the CDC promotes the "covid-19" narrative. On the contrary, most of the data does the opposite. They expect people to not look, and those that do look they expect to be too afraid to say anything, or be discredited by those of their peers who are.
As for the peer reviewed paper I linked, it is a peer reviewed paper. You can find it on literally every single publisher of peer reviewed papers. Here are a few non-CDC links:
https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/49/D1/D706/5921286
https://europepmc.org/article/MED/33585048
https://covid19.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/gess-a-database-of-global-evaluation-of-sars-cov-2hcov-19-sequenc
I can list a hundred more if you want. Its a peer reviewed paper. This is just how it works. It goes to all peer reviewed journals.
If you want to talk about how all peer reviewed science is suspect, that's another topic. It would be one that every scientist in the world agrees with, and has through all of time. In fact, that is how science works.
What it is however, is credible evidence. To refute scientific evidence requires refuting the arguments and analyses within the work. It never works to just say "your source is not credible because I don't like them." That is the opposite of debate.
That is called an ad hominem attack. It is a weak tactic by those that have no actual counter arguments. You can only provide a counter argument in a scientific debate by understanding and cogitating on the original arguments.
Your attacks on the researchgate papers are completely not credible, and you obviously have NO IDEA what researchgate is. It is literally the best place to find real science in a world trying to hide evidence.
Is that all you want?
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida
NIAID’s Rocky Mountain Laboratories
University of the Western Cape (UWC) and Stellenbosch University (SU) (South Africa)
McMaster’s Institute for Infectious Disease Research
How many more would you like? I can do this all day (although I won't).
I am not saying these are all credible sources. I have not vetted them. I looked at the first one, and as someone who has performed similar experiments it looks completely legit at first glance.
But if I were to say these specific labs stating explicitly that they have isolated the virus are lying I would have to read each one in detail and find evidence of the lies. If I were to just make the claim they are lying because I don't like them I would become a non-credible source of information myself.
"Fake News......you know im changing the name right?.... to Very Fake News..."
Donald Trump..your POTUS
Well first...not one comment have i stated support or trust for anyone, either side.. I get your point, and the other person's comments..but the guy in video is stating exactly the same points we all know and agree on..but many calling him wrong because a few cannot "source" him? Is he not factually correct in the context of his statements? Some here shooting the messenger, even though we agree with his info..thats fine..you guys are missing the point...
the CDC and NIH or anyone or organization the reference, are the enemies..but suddenly here their info is being defended.. makes no sense.. I mostly only trust God and myself..but thanks for suggesting whom i Should trust
I'm a researcher in biology and nanotechnology. I neither "know" nor "agree" with anything this man said. Not because I don't want to, but because I looked quite hard and found no credible sources to corroborate. In addition, when checking out THIS person, I found zero credibility in his testimony or even evidence of his existence at all.
He was not factually correct in ANY of his statements that I could find, and I looked very, very hard. He didn't even say everything correctly about the biology. This makes me very suspect, although cell biology is very complicated. Even those with knowledge make mistakes in the details sometimes.
The people at the top of these organizations are almost certainly our enemies, but the vast majority of people that work at, for, or with these organizations are not. Some are brainwashed, some are not. A very good friend of mine works for the FDA and she is based as fuck. But that is not how science is done. It doesn't matter what a person says, it matters what the SCIENCE says.
Anyone with sufficient knowledge can go into their data and see the problems with it. A scientist can lie, and they can try to use science to do it, but science cannot lie. Anyone with knowledge can see the problems with any published science because the problems are there, usually in plain sight, for anyone to see.
I have used the data from the CDC to red-pill other scientists. To think we can't use their data or experiments published on their site is idiotic, or more specifically, ignorant.
I do not recommend you trust the CDC. I don't trust them one iota. But I know what I read in the experiments and papers, the source is irrelevant. If it smells like bullshit, its bullshit, no matter the source. This guy smells like bullshit. Its just the truth of it from someone with experience in this specific field.
I welcome any other evidence to support the claims this person makes. My mind is never made up, but on this guy, without anything else to corroborate, and with what I know (biology), I am giving this a very high probability of being purposeful disinformation to make people with real knowledge, stating real problems with the vaccine and the scamdemic look like "conspiracy theorists."
You're So right...Everything you have typed...I was wrong to think i could match your wits.Forgive me typing-ill of the CDC or any of your favorite research sites. I sure will think twice about repeating any of my "idiotic" or" ignorant" ideas next time. Thanks for teaching me, and everyone that Covid-19 is Real and that its not actually just influenza strains in an altered state. Man glad we got that cleared up. Ill put my mask back on and shut up mr Fauci.
...just wow....you heard it here first folks...we got a RealVirus on our hands!!! Lol...And since i cant or wont source you and mr "smarter=than=anyone-else", by your own logic, i wont be trusting you either..Thanks for lining me out though. Lol ...And using CDC and NIH is no different... Lets agree to disagree...