My son just showed me this video today (warning, contains quite a bit of language, etc--probably not best for work or around kids). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sDSv5WQ1m0 It pulls together about a zillion "conspiracies" we all talk about and which Q has confirmed, but it was posted 11/17/16--almost a year before Q's first post. What I found especially interesting was his "open letter" at the end, essentially telling the deep state that we're going to win and it's game over for them. This whole video is basically Q theory from start to finish, including that we will WIN, but it predates Q by a year, and it looks like Neal Fox has been posting conspiracy info for about a decade. I don't know that this has any significance other than being interesting, but I thought I'd share it and see what you all think about it.
Anyone heard of Neal Fox and the Conspiracy Project?
?️ DISCUSSION ?
After all, Q presents a very ugly and upsetting reality. No one could possibly want it to be true, so we should interrogate it carefully to see if it is. The best case scenario for everyone would be to disprove it.
Allow me to interject; you're being attacked by another handshake and people that don't quite understand what you're getting at, or at least as I understand it. You're also being attacked by people with their own extreme biases and views that are not endorsed or related to Q or Q's posts in any way other than their own association between them.
let's be clear: Q has not mentioned adrenochrome in any posts. Q has not talked about blood drinking.
Q has discussed pedophilia and human trafficking significantly. These concepts are not at all conspiracy theories; we know there are millions of people, especially children, trafficked constantly. Q elaborates and asks leading questions to get people to dig into this more and find out that Epstein was simply the tip of the ice berg, and that the elites have extensive connections with pedophilia and human trafficking. This is also not a conspiracy or a theory, it is mainstream acknowledged truth; again, see the Epstein situation.
Q has also mentioned child sacrifice/satanic rituals. This is not in a specific context; it is not inherently implying that the elites do this: "The child abductions for satanic rituals (ie Haiti and other 3rd world countries)" (drop 29). This could imply third-worlders doing human sacrifice (which has been documented before, as I recall) or it could imply that the elites do it, which is also believable given the various weird statements many elites have made and some of the apparent findings of Epstein's island as well as Epstein's reported beliefs. Q has not extensively covered child sacrifice; I only found it in one or two of the thousands of posts.
Q has also talked extensively about the "Deep State", a name which may not be unique to that which it is used to describe, but it is descriptive and effective nonetheless. Left and right believe in the gist of the "deep state", regardless of whether or not it is really called this. There is an overwhelming amount of evidence and hard proof that there is an aristocracy of elites that effectively control the government; they're not necessarily elected or in electable positions, meaning they constitute a "deep"ly rooted "state".
What Q brings to the table aren't at all the premises of it; corruption is a fact and not particularly hidden or unknown. The two biggest things Q brings to the table are: 1.) More detailed information that forms a cohesive picture of governmental corruption, provided in a Socratic format (which has the benefit of encouraging free research and independent conclusions). 2.) Information about a supposed plan by "white hats" ("good guys") in government seeking to root out the corruption and restore government to the people.
Q establishes legitimacy and verifies themselves through dozens if not hundreds of posts dedicated to said verification; when these posts are evaluated and the connections/verification methods are established, they are referred to as "Q proofs". Some are better than others (some are arguably bullshit entirely); together, they paint a pretty convincing picture, to the point where those that do not believe what Q attempts to supply through the Socratic method and assurances still believe that Q has insider information. That is where many believe it is a reverse-operation reminiscent of the Soviet "operation trust". Most of these claims are logically refutable when evaluating Trump's public actions and direct responses to "Q" in general; Trump appears to passively endorse it (something he does not do for other things such as the Patriot party, implying something specific about Q that is legitimate or unique above a newly-founded party that they denounce within about two weeks); something that has lead to no denunciation and a lot of implied support (see the Q proofs for more on that), even when directly confronted about it on multiple occasions by the media. If Q were a counter-operation of some kind, Trump would likely need to be in on it, which is not particularly logical given that a state capable of fabricating Trump should not need to fabricate Trump.
To go a step further in rebuking those attacking you; Q has never mentioned "the jews" or anything like that, excluding a specific reference to how the Nazis treated the Jews in/around World War II. Blaming "(((THEM)))" on our problems is not what Q does; I daresay, it contradicts the words and actions of Q as well as the Trump administration. That kind of sentiment and conspiracy does not reflect the views of the overwhelming majority of Q supporters, because it's frankly illogical, childish, and delusional.
If you have any further questions, feel free to let me know! I strongly encourage you to do your own research; don't just take my (or anyone else's) word for it, go explore yourself.
The Q post archive I use: https://qposts.online/