I can believe posts with keywords (esp. with unusual punctuation), but these date posts are the least credible in my opinion.
And I don't buy that the Trump insiders at WaPost (possible, esp. with Bezo's* retirement) timed the retraction release date, just so Trump's response would line up with this post.
Q tells you to use game theory, and my game theory tells me that this post is baloney
The statement was a response to the Washington Post Retraction
The date has nothing to do with Q
Trump's was responding to the Washington Post's retraction from TODAY.
Unless the Washington Post intentionally timed their retraction to match this Q post, Trump's response has NOTHING to do with Q.
Sorry, but someone's gotta maintain quality control here
Sorry, but I don't buy it.
I can believe posts with keywords (esp. with unusual punctuation), but these date posts are the least credible in my opinion.
And I don't buy that the Trump insiders at WaPost (possible, esp. with Bezo's* retirement) timed the retraction release date, just so Trump's response would line up with this post.
Q tells you to use game theory, and my game theory tells me that this post is baloney