I saw a earlier post saying we need to stop circling time stamps and that because there are more than 2359 Q posts, every timestamp has a corresponding Q post. That is very true but not every Q post is relevant to todays events. We could post thousands of Tweets here from different sources with corresponding Q posts and they make no sense. Typically, the ones you see have significance. Also, not everyone joining us today knows what is going on. So if timestamps are pointed to it can help new people realize what we are looking at. Keep circling your time stamps, its working so far.
I also saw some say that Q posts >2359 can not be referred back to, perhaps they can. I have not experimented with it because I'm lazy at times but I saw someone add the dates with the time stamp to get Q drops > 2359. For example:
[Option 1:]
If you wanted to point to Q post 4441
Today is 3 / 18 / 2021
318 + 2021 = 2339
So you could post something at timestamp 2102, add it to the date 2339,
You get Q post 4441
The wait will soon be over.
Q
[Option 2:]
If you wanted to point to Q post 4396
3 + 18 + 2021 = 2042
You could post something with a timestamp of 2354, add to the date 2042
You get Q post 4396
God Wins
Q
I saw someone say something earlier about referring back to Q posts xx60 through xx99, obviously timestamps can only refer back to Q posts xx00 through xx59
However , If anyone was following Q during this whole process you will remember that some days Q would go crazy dropping 20 -30 posts on one day. These posts may have been filler, evidence, pictures or even prior posts to get through the dead zone of xx60 through xx99.
If this plan was figured out years in advance and future "happening" dates were known, Then the dates and times of future Scavino or US Navy drops would need to calculated as well.
If you remember Q made the statement that things were on schedule several times. But typically timestamps do not refer back to specific events but more so statements that reassure us the plan is going "as planned" to maintain the hopium. For instance "God Wins"
I am sure there are many more levels to this plan that we have not figured out yet, when it is all over we will be shown and we will all say, "Damn, why didn't we see that!!"
Stay safe my frens!!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
The highest Q post that could be referred to today is 4698.
3/18/2021
318 + 2021 = 2339
Time stamp 2359 +2339 = 4698
Last Q drop was 4953
There are 255 of Q's newest posts beyond 4698 that can't be referred back to presently.
However, with each month that passes the date increases by a unit of 100.
So, in the next 3 months all Q posts could be referred back to using date, year and time stamp combinations.
This might be an indication that this plan will end in the next 3 months and may be a indication why Q stopped posting at 4953.
I've been meaning to ask, but where does the formula: qpost_num = mmdd + yyyy formula come from ? I've seen that formula, directly searching for the date of the post, using 100 day delta, using the timestamp in EST time base, and then using Q clock as ways of deriving target dates. I haven't figured out what's the proper way to datefag.
Cross-references to times and dates appear to be a way for trusted people to send coded comms to Q followers.
These comms are not Q comms. No external comms.
We must also be wary of non-trusted people using the same method. Anyone can piece together several Q drops into some message and contrive a tweet or something that ties them together with numeric cross-references.
Kansas' comms with scripture indexes, timestamps, and deltas, are the most sophisticated. Furthermore, once connected, there is a deeper meaning revealed that cross-references the texts in a not-readily-apparent way.
Some of these shallow cross-reference comms are interesting and are perhaps important, but the deeper comms from trusted people are almost certainly way more important, and I wonder how many of those we miss.
Any Q post > than 2359 can be referred to If your post is after 0317 (3:17am) and add the date and year. 2042 +317 = 2359
some people s egos are too big and think that new people have no right having anything explained to them.
I got into a argument about this back in 2019 with a "popular" youtuber which no one seems to talk about anymore
I am happy to read decodes where there are multiple correlations. For instance the timestamp of a tweet leads to a Q post, but also the content of the tweet matches the content in that post. When those happen, its pretty clear that a message was intended.
But if the only correlation is just the timestamp, we have to take it with a bit of skepticism.
Random numbers, no...its the date year and time, those are not random numbers.
If you are not enjoying the ride, you can jump off any time you like.
Nobody is keeping you here.
Perhaps you haven't noticed but the only reason we are here is because of those Q posts.
Until this is over I'm going to keep referring back to those Q posts.
The fact that Q told us many times "You have more than you know", I'm going to assume there is still clues we are not seeing.
If you are here to discourage people from using their brains, you are a determent to the operation and should be deported.
this one has been here 3 months, has a post score of 193, not really adding anything to the conversation, looking at previous comments, he is inciting division, lets deport him.
If you want to gain any respect around here, respectful conduct is necessary. Acting like a jackass and using foul language is frowned upon and it will get you banned. If all you do is criticize posts without adding any content of your own I will continue to deport you and suggest others do the same. You have failed to add any commentary since you joined more than 3 months ago, we typically call someone like yourself a shill. For future reference, before you criticize future posts from fellow board members, why don't try adding to the conversation with some of your own ideas. If you have nothing nice to say its best to keep your trap shut.
Ya failed to add commentary...here ya go. "SuICide wEEkEnd?" "SHadoW prEsIDent" Now ive contributed as much as you lol
Wow, how old are you and can you act any more immature?
I don't that Q has not made any predictions, he has only asked questions and made statements.
Now the anonymous people watching have tried to guess when this plan comes to a conclusion, yes they have made many hopeful predictions but nothing was ever said to be 100%, thats why they call them predictions.
I can name many different topics that were talked about over the last 4 years that anonymous figures gave input on that seemed to culminate in to a solution.
NXIVM
Epstein
Weinstein
Maxwell
resignations of thousands of CEO's
early retirement of many politicians / not seeking re-election
Many Hollywood movie stars who failed to make any movies last year
I'm not going to waist any more time with honest questions that seem to insult me.
No, I'm mean the stuff thats been going on for many decades that was stopped in the last 4 years, that Q talked about.
Been here 1 hour, zero post score, deport