I saw a earlier post saying we need to stop circling time stamps and that because there are more than 2359 Q posts, every timestamp has a corresponding Q post. That is very true but not every Q post is relevant to todays events. We could post thousands of Tweets here from different sources with corresponding Q posts and they make no sense. Typically, the ones you see have significance. Also, not everyone joining us today knows what is going on. So if timestamps are pointed to it can help new people realize what we are looking at. Keep circling your time stamps, its working so far.
I also saw some say that Q posts >2359 can not be referred back to, perhaps they can. I have not experimented with it because I'm lazy at times but I saw someone add the dates with the time stamp to get Q drops > 2359. For example:
[Option 1:]
If you wanted to point to Q post 4441
Today is 3 / 18 / 2021
318 + 2021 = 2339
So you could post something at timestamp 2102, add it to the date 2339,
You get Q post 4441
The wait will soon be over.
Q
[Option 2:]
If you wanted to point to Q post 4396
3 + 18 + 2021 = 2042
You could post something with a timestamp of 2354, add to the date 2042
You get Q post 4396
God Wins
Q
I saw someone say something earlier about referring back to Q posts xx60 through xx99, obviously timestamps can only refer back to Q posts xx00 through xx59
However , If anyone was following Q during this whole process you will remember that some days Q would go crazy dropping 20 -30 posts on one day. These posts may have been filler, evidence, pictures or even prior posts to get through the dead zone of xx60 through xx99.
If this plan was figured out years in advance and future "happening" dates were known, Then the dates and times of future Scavino or US Navy drops would need to calculated as well.
If you remember Q made the statement that things were on schedule several times. But typically timestamps do not refer back to specific events but more so statements that reassure us the plan is going "as planned" to maintain the hopium. For instance "God Wins"
I am sure there are many more levels to this plan that we have not figured out yet, when it is all over we will be shown and we will all say, "Damn, why didn't we see that!!"
Stay safe my frens!!!!
WWG1WGA!!!
I am happy to read decodes where there are multiple correlations. For instance the timestamp of a tweet leads to a Q post, but also the content of the tweet matches the content in that post. When those happen, its pretty clear that a message was intended.
But if the only correlation is just the timestamp, we have to take it with a bit of skepticism.