As I understand it, the people behind the great reset are also on record saying they want to depopulate the Earth by 90%, for "environmental reasons".
The French Revolution leaders also made a similar proclamation, prior to the revolution, that they wanted to reduce France's population from 28 million to below 8 million.
It's easier to control fewer people, easier to identify and remove dissent before it grows.
Yea I never understood why global elites didn’t scale with the population scaling. Guess they couldn’t eat us fast enough. I just want this entire evil to end but it might be worse for it to end and half the people still asleep like a bunch of sheep just waiting for orders.
Yeah, that could leave room for instability ... a power vacuum ... if 50% of the population were asleep and leaderless.
In terms of global elites not scaling with population scaling, it's not something I've given much thought, but if I were to wager a guess, it has to do with how the fraction of the population who are "super elite" doesn't grow much relative to population growth ... the richest of the rich stay the richest of the rich, and, they like that monopoly power, so, they stifle growth of other up and coming potential globalists.
There's probably some good economic theories to explain that sort of thing, if you make the assumption that global elites tend to consist of mostly the richest
people in the world.
As I understand it, the people behind the great reset are also on record saying they want to depopulate the Earth by 90%, for "environmental reasons".
The French Revolution leaders also made a similar proclamation, prior to the revolution, that they wanted to reduce France's population from 28 million to below 8 million.
It's easier to control fewer people, easier to identify and remove dissent before it grows.
Yea I never understood why global elites didn’t scale with the population scaling. Guess they couldn’t eat us fast enough. I just want this entire evil to end but it might be worse for it to end and half the people still asleep like a bunch of sheep just waiting for orders.
Yeah, that could leave room for instability ... a power vacuum ... if 50% of the population were asleep and leaderless.
In terms of global elites not scaling with population scaling, it's not something I've given much thought, but if I were to wager a guess, it has to do with how the fraction of the population who are "super elite" doesn't grow much relative to population growth ... the richest of the rich stay the richest of the rich, and, they like that monopoly power, so, they stifle growth of other up and coming potential globalists.
There's probably some good economic theories to explain that sort of thing, if you make the assumption that global elites tend to consist of mostly the richest people in the world.