The fact of the matter is that basically all symbols have multiple uses. If we rely on those symbols to tell us anything of value we're operating on total bullshit.
Context is important; if someone is using a symbol out of typical context, chances are the meaning is not the typical (and usually innocent) meaning.
I personally never really put a whole lot of stock into the other stuff; sure, maybe satanists use owls as symbolism, but owls are also amazing creatures and many people love them, and as such, wear things bearing their image. They are God's creation, after all, so who are we to side with the evil meanings of them over the good?
Or take Pizza; pizza is delicious. Pizza is also a codeword used by pedos. probably 95% of people that say that they're going to get pizza are literally going to get pizza. If someone says something about pizza where real pizza doesn't make sense, that's where the red flag goes up.
Then there are the pattern symbols, for example the spiral-triangle Nordic rune. Sure bad people might have their own meaning for it, but let's be real; it's a Nordic symbol that first and foremost is usually used because it looks cool or is visibly Nordic.
Symbols are just another form of language. Words have many different meanings depending on their context; so do symbols. A "devils horns" could be equated to a sort of yell; sometimes yelling can be done in anger, sometimes it can be done in evil, sometimes it can be done in joy or humor.
There's a difference between an infiltrator trying to use symbols for their evil message and someone who consistently preaches a good message using a symbol for its original meaning/in its original context.
You are pretty wrong. Fixation on "finding Satan" is arguably a form of satanic worship in itself; just love God and all his works; that includes our hands (and the gestures from them) and so much more.
Actions speak louder than words. The people we pay attention to and comment on their use of demonic symbols have literally done really fucked up if not down right evil things. The symbolism is a way for us to explain their actions, Tom's actions thus far have been nothing but pure truth telling. For him to be seen throwing up what is considered a perfectly normal reaction to good music, as a musician doesn't in my eyes make him a devil worshipper. Now the funding pope just talking to some people and throwing them up, seem out of place. I think your accusation of hypocrisy is not really warranted.
Many people believe or do not believe many things. You judging him for what he doesn't believe, is the same as CNN judging us for what we do believe. It works both ways, I mean no ill will what so ever, but it seems like you are the one now being hypocritical. Not everyone on our side will be fully awake, but we cannot knock them down because they are not. At least this man is reaching millions of people and making them think, which is more than most of what us on here are doing. I will back him up for this reason alone. But even still if you think he is evil or whatnot, he is the enemy of your enemy.
I don't particularly believe the elites drink baby blood in any literal way. There's virtually no hard evidence for this, and while I wouldn't put it past them, I think it brings them zero benefits and as such they wouldn't waste it on that when they can put babies to use for their other evil actions.
They're already evil enough as it is, I don't feel any need to believe some of the more far out stuff like "drinking baby blood" to be opposed to the elites who are destroying our society and lives.
How many people would just stop listening if he said the opposite? We have to start the conversation somehow, and Tom has done an excellent job starting the conversation.
This community is all about symbolism until it pertains to someone they approve of.
I've never been one for symbolism.
The fact of the matter is that basically all symbols have multiple uses. If we rely on those symbols to tell us anything of value we're operating on total bullshit.
Context is important; if someone is using a symbol out of typical context, chances are the meaning is not the typical (and usually innocent) meaning.
I personally never really put a whole lot of stock into the other stuff; sure, maybe satanists use owls as symbolism, but owls are also amazing creatures and many people love them, and as such, wear things bearing their image. They are God's creation, after all, so who are we to side with the evil meanings of them over the good?
Or take Pizza; pizza is delicious. Pizza is also a codeword used by pedos. probably 95% of people that say that they're going to get pizza are literally going to get pizza. If someone says something about pizza where real pizza doesn't make sense, that's where the red flag goes up.
Then there are the pattern symbols, for example the spiral-triangle Nordic rune. Sure bad people might have their own meaning for it, but let's be real; it's a Nordic symbol that first and foremost is usually used because it looks cool or is visibly Nordic.
Symbols are just another form of language. Words have many different meanings depending on their context; so do symbols. A "devils horns" could be equated to a sort of yell; sometimes yelling can be done in anger, sometimes it can be done in evil, sometimes it can be done in joy or humor.
There's a difference between an infiltrator trying to use symbols for their evil message and someone who consistently preaches a good message using a symbol for its original meaning/in its original context.
Satan is able to disguise himself very well. Am I wrong?
You are pretty wrong. Fixation on "finding Satan" is arguably a form of satanic worship in itself; just love God and all his works; that includes our hands (and the gestures from them) and so much more.
No, I am not.
I made a claim he is throwing up the horns; and I provided visual evidence to support it.
He's right, you know.
Actions speak louder than words. The people we pay attention to and comment on their use of demonic symbols have literally done really fucked up if not down right evil things. The symbolism is a way for us to explain their actions, Tom's actions thus far have been nothing but pure truth telling. For him to be seen throwing up what is considered a perfectly normal reaction to good music, as a musician doesn't in my eyes make him a devil worshipper. Now the funding pope just talking to some people and throwing them up, seem out of place. I think your accusation of hypocrisy is not really warranted.
That is a lot of excuses for someone throwing up the devil horns. He also "doesn't believe the elite drinks baby blood."
Many people believe or do not believe many things. You judging him for what he doesn't believe, is the same as CNN judging us for what we do believe. It works both ways, I mean no ill will what so ever, but it seems like you are the one now being hypocritical. Not everyone on our side will be fully awake, but we cannot knock them down because they are not. At least this man is reaching millions of people and making them think, which is more than most of what us on here are doing. I will back him up for this reason alone. But even still if you think he is evil or whatnot, he is the enemy of your enemy.
No matter how much you type, you aren't going to change the fact he is gesturing to Satan.
I don't particularly believe the elites drink baby blood in any literal way. There's virtually no hard evidence for this, and while I wouldn't put it past them, I think it brings them zero benefits and as such they wouldn't waste it on that when they can put babies to use for their other evil actions.
They're already evil enough as it is, I don't feel any need to believe some of the more far out stuff like "drinking baby blood" to be opposed to the elites who are destroying our society and lives.
Canaanites were/are very much real.
How many people would just stop listening if he said the opposite? We have to start the conversation somehow, and Tom has done an excellent job starting the conversation.
You can either accept what is in front of you or not.