11.4 coming up -- Capital fences finally coming down....
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Can you talk about what 11.4 entails as it relates to the fences being taken down? Thank you.
The DoD Law of War Manual.
Section 11.3 defines the terms of ending a belligerent occupation, and specifically clarifies that mere continued presence of foreign agents in a territory does not represent an occupation. The fence was the condition giving rise to a hostile occupation. With its removal, we move the 11.4 stage, which defines the legal relations between the Occupying Power, the ousted sovereign authority, and the people.
Recommend you download the DOD Law of War manual and read up on section 11, Military Occupation, for a full understanding of the significance of this event.
I have, but I think the general problem is keeping the "belligerent" and "occupying" and "sovereign authority" players straight. Which side is the NG? I think most people would think of them as "occupying" in the circumstances, but Congress is not so clear. Or the ordinary citizens of DC, are they "occupying"? They aren't very belligerent, except the Mayor and BLM. The legalese needs clarifying to be a better message.
I would argue the Occupying Power is the alliance of foreign nation states that have installed their agents to illegally seize control of our government. That includes the domestic politicians that are worked with them to assist in the hostile takeover of our country. The NG are simply peacekeepers in this view, with no skin in the game. The war is being fought with electronics, not guns. Congress will thus be split between occupying forces and our own sovereign representatives who are attempting to work within the framework that the Occupying Power has established. The terms "hostile" and "belligerent" have a very specific legal meaning. It does not have to mean actual fighting, any more than a hostile takeover of a company means you need to shoot the board of directors. It simply means you are doing something in an adversarial way.
This makes sense, but it still is going to be hard to explain to those who never heard this theory why some people are all right and some are "occupying forces." Seems to me that message will have major media opposition because the media is 90% controlled by the occupiers. The media will have to be upended first.
Think mirror: 11.4 = 4/11.
It's an important day historically.